| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 12:33:11 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] PM: cpu: Add CPU_LAST_PM_ENTER and
CPU_FIRST_PM_EXIT support
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 07:30:50PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 08:55:34PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > It becomes a common situation on some platforms that certain hardware
> > setup needs to be done on the last standing cpu, and rpmh-rsc[1] is such
> > an existing example. As figuring out the last standing cpu is really
> > something generic, it adds CPU_LAST_PM_ENTER (and CPU_FIRST_PM_EXIT)
> > event support to cpu_pm helper, so that individual driver can be
> > notified when the last standing cpu is about to enter low power state.
>
> Sorry for not getting back on the previous email thread.
> When I meant I didn't want to use CPU_CLUSTER_PM_{ENTER,EXIT}, I wasn't
> thinking new ones to be added as alternative. With this OSI cpuidle, we
> have introduces the concept of power domains and I was check if we can
> associate these requirements to them rather than introducing the first
> and last cpu notion. The power domains already identify them in order
> to turn on or off. Not sure if there is any notification mechanism in
> genpd/power domains. I really don't like this addition. It is disintegrating
> all the solutions for OSI and makes it hard to understand.
>
> One solution I can think of(not sure if others like or if that is feasible)
> is to create a parent power domain that encloses all the last level CPU
> power domains, which means when the last one is getting powered off, you
> will be asked to power off and you can take whatever action you want.
Thanks Sudeep for the input! Yes, it works for me (if I understand your
suggestion correctly). So the needed changes on top of the current
version would be:
1) Declare MPM as a PD (power domain) provider and have it be the
parent PD of cpu cluster (the platform has only one cluster including
4 cpus).
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm2290.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm2290.dtsi
index 5bc5ce0b5d77..0cd0a9722ec5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm2290.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm2290.dtsi
@@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ CPU_PD3: cpu3 {
CLUSTER_PD: cpu-cluster0 {
#power-domain-cells = <0>;
+ power-domains = <&mpm>;
domain-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
};
};
@@ -490,6 +491,7 @@ mpm: interrupt-controller@...01b8 {
interrupt-controller;
interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
+ #power-domain-cells = <0>;
qcom,mpm-pin-count = <96>;
qcom,mpm-pin-map = <2 275>, /* tsens0_tsens_upper_lower_int */
<5 296>, /* lpass_irq_out_sdc */
2) Add PD in MPM driver and call qcom_mpm_enter_sleep() from .power_off
hook of the PD.
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/qcom-mpm.c b/drivers/irqchip/qcom-mpm.c
index d3d8251e57e4..f4409c169a3a 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/qcom-mpm.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/qcom-mpm.c
@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
* Copyright (c) 2010-2020, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
*/
-#include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
@@ -18,6 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/soc/qcom/irq.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ struct qcom_mpm_priv {
unsigned int map_cnt;
unsigned int reg_stride;
struct irq_domain *domain;
- struct notifier_block pm_nb;
+ struct generic_pm_domain genpd;
};
static u32 qcom_mpm_read(struct qcom_mpm_priv *priv, unsigned int reg,
@@ -312,23 +312,12 @@ static int qcom_mpm_enter_sleep(struct qcom_mpm_priv *priv)
return 0;
}
-static int qcom_mpm_cpu_pm_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
- unsigned long action, void *data)
+static int mpm_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
- struct qcom_mpm_priv *priv = container_of(nb, struct qcom_mpm_priv,
- pm_nb);
- int ret = NOTIFY_OK;
-
- switch (action) {
- case CPU_LAST_PM_ENTER:
- if (qcom_mpm_enter_sleep(priv))
- ret = NOTIFY_BAD;
- break;
- default:
- ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
- }
+ struct qcom_mpm_priv *priv = container_of(genpd, struct qcom_mpm_priv,
+ genpd);
- return ret;
+ return qcom_mpm_enter_sleep(priv);
}
static int qcom_mpm_init(struct device_node *np, struct device_node *parent)
@@ -336,6 +325,7 @@ static int qcom_mpm_init(struct device_node *np, struct device_node *parent)
struct platform_device *pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct irq_domain *parent_domain;
+ struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
struct qcom_mpm_priv *priv;
unsigned int pin_cnt;
int i, irq;
@@ -387,6 +377,26 @@ static int qcom_mpm_init(struct device_node *np, struct device_node *parent)
if (irq < 0)
return irq;
+ genpd = &priv->genpd;
+ genpd->flags = GENPD_FLAG_IRQ_SAFE;
+ genpd->power_off = mpm_pd_power_off;
+
+ genpd->name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s", dev_name(dev));
+ if (!genpd->name)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ret = pm_genpd_init(genpd, NULL, false);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to init genpd: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = of_genpd_add_provider_simple(np, genpd);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to add genpd provider: %d\n", ret);
+ goto remove_genpd;
+ }
+
priv->mbox_client.dev = dev;
priv->mbox_chan = mbox_request_channel(&priv->mbox_client, 0);
if (IS_ERR(priv->mbox_chan)) {
@@ -420,15 +430,14 @@ static int qcom_mpm_init(struct device_node *np, struct device_node *parent)
goto remove_domain;
}
- priv->pm_nb.notifier_call = qcom_mpm_cpu_pm_callback;
- cpu_pm_register_notifier(&priv->pm_nb);
-
return 0;
remove_domain:
irq_domain_remove(priv->domain);
free_mbox:
mbox_free_channel(priv->mbox_chan);
+remove_genpd:
+ pm_genpd_remove(genpd);
return ret;
}
Let's me know if this is what you are asking for, thanks!
Shawn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists