| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CABVgOSkUb4wbyMnwsdO5AmEz31q_adJ2enaPuo8SkgbLTsgCTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:53:15 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: stackinit: Convert to KUnit
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 1:51 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Convert to running under Kunit (and retain being able to run stand-alone
> too). Building under Clang (or GCC 12) with CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO=y,
> this now passes as expected:
>
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config --make_option LLVM=1
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run overflow --make_option LLVM=1 \
> --kconfig_add CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO=y
Should this be "...kunit.py run 'stackinit'...", not overflow?
> ...
> [09:47:28] ================= stackinit (65 subtests) ==================
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_u8_zero
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_u16_zero
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_u32_zero
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_u64_zero
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_char_array_zero
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_small_hole_zero
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_big_hole_zero
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_trailing_hole_zero
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_packed_zero
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_small_hole_dynamic_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_big_hole_dynamic_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_trailing_hole_dynamic_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_packed_dynamic_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_small_hole_assigned_dynamic_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_big_hole_assigned_dynamic_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_trailing_hole_assigned_dynamic_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_packed_assigned_dynamic_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_small_hole_static_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_big_hole_static_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_trailing_hole_static_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_packed_static_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_small_hole_static_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_big_hole_static_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_trailing_hole_static_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_packed_static_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_small_hole_dynamic_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_big_hole_dynamic_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_trailing_hole_dynamic_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_packed_dynamic_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_small_hole_runtime_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_big_hole_runtime_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_trailing_hole_runtime_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_packed_runtime_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_small_hole_runtime_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_big_hole_runtime_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_trailing_hole_runtime_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_packed_runtime_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_small_hole_assigned_static_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_big_hole_assigned_static_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_trailing_hole_assigned_static_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_packed_assigned_static_partial
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_small_hole_assigned_static_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_big_hole_assigned_static_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_trailing_hole_assigned_static_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_packed_assigned_static_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_small_hole_assigned_dynamic_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_big_hole_assigned_dynamic_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_trailing_hole_assigned_dynamic_all
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_packed_assigned_dynamic_all
> [09:47:28] [SKIPPED] test_small_hole_assigned_copy
> [09:47:28] [SKIPPED] test_big_hole_assigned_copy
> [09:47:28] [SKIPPED] test_trailing_hole_assigned_copy
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_packed_assigned_copy
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_u8_none
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_u16_none
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_u32_none
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_u64_none
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_char_array_none
> [09:47:28] [SKIPPED] test_switch_1_none
> [09:47:28] [SKIPPED] test_switch_2_none
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_small_hole_none
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_big_hole_none
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_trailing_hole_none
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_packed_none
> [09:47:28] [PASSED] test_user
> [09:47:28] ==================== [PASSED] stackinit ====================
> [09:47:28] ============================================================
> [09:47:28] Testing complete. Passed: 60, Failed: 0, Crashed: 0, Skipped: 5, Errors: 0
> [09:47:28] Elapsed time: 4.192s total, 0.001s configuring, 4.070s building, 0.102s running
>
> Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
This looks pretty good as a KUnit test overall, even if it does some
unusual (but cool!) things with the userland version.
A few comments inline.
Cheers,
-- David
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 26 +-
> lib/Makefile | 4 +-
> lib/{test_stackinit.c => stackinit_kunit.c} | 249 ++++++++++++--------
> 3 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)
> rename lib/{test_stackinit.c => stackinit_kunit.c} (73%)
>
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 14d90d03bc8d..ea4415275563 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -2511,6 +2511,21 @@ config OVERFLOW_KUNIT_TEST
>
> If unsure, say N.
>
> +config STACKINIT_KUNIT_TEST
> + tristate "Test level of stack variable initialization" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + depends on KUNIT
> + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
We probably don't want to enable this test by default (with
KUNIT_ALL_TESTS) if we don't have CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO=y, as
that'll result in a number of failures for any "all tests"
configuration.
Does it make sense to either:
1. Make this test depend on INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO?
2. Just change the default, so that KUNIT_ALL_TESTS doesn't trigger it
(or doesn't trigger it unless INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO is also enabled), so
people can force it to build/run and see the failures?
3. Make it run, but mark some or all tests as SKIPPED if
INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO is not set (as a failure here is expected)?
> + help
> + Test if the kernel is zero-initializing stack variables and
> + padding. Coverage is controlled by compiler flags,
> + CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK, CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF,
> + or CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF_ALL.
> +
> + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer
> + to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.
> +
> + If unsure, say N.
> +
> config TEST_UDELAY
> tristate "udelay test driver"
> help
> @@ -2602,17 +2617,6 @@ config TEST_OBJAGG
> Enable this option to test object aggregation manager on boot
> (or module load).
>
> -
> -config TEST_STACKINIT
> - tristate "Test level of stack variable initialization"
> - help
> - Test if the kernel is zero-initializing stack variables and
> - padding. Coverage is controlled by compiler flags,
> - CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK, CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF,
> - or CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF_ALL.
> -
> - If unsure, say N.
> -
> config TEST_MEMINIT
> tristate "Test heap/page initialization"
> help
> diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
> index fdfcbfaff32f..353bc09ce38d 100644
> --- a/lib/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/Makefile
> @@ -93,8 +93,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_KMOD) += test_kmod.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_DEBUG_VIRTUAL) += test_debug_virtual.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_MEMCAT_P) += test_memcat_p.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_OBJAGG) += test_objagg.o
> -CFLAGS_test_stackinit.o += $(call cc-disable-warning, switch-unreachable)
> -obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_STACKINIT) += test_stackinit.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_BLACKHOLE_DEV) += test_blackhole_dev.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_MEMINIT) += test_meminit.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_LOCKUP) += test_lockup.o
> @@ -363,6 +361,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CMDLINE_KUNIT_TEST) += cmdline_kunit.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SLUB_KUNIT_TEST) += slub_kunit.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MEMCPY_KUNIT_TEST) += memcpy_kunit.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_OVERFLOW_KUNIT_TEST) += overflow_kunit.o
FYI: Due to this context line, this patch only applies cleanly if the
overflow test port patch is applied first.
> +CFLAGS_stackinit_kunit.o += $(call cc-disable-warning, switch-unreachable)
> +obj-$(CONFIG_STACKINIT_KUNIT_TEST) += stackinit_kunit.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED) += devmem_is_allowed.o
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_stackinit.c b/lib/stackinit_kunit.c
> similarity index 73%
> rename from lib/test_stackinit.c
> rename to lib/stackinit_kunit.c
> index a3c74e6a21ff..72c7d4cb8ed2 100644
> --- a/lib/test_stackinit.c
> +++ b/lib/stackinit_kunit.c
> @@ -2,14 +2,23 @@
> /*
> * Test cases for compiler-based stack variable zeroing via
> * -ftrivial-auto-var-init={zero,pattern} or CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK*.
> + * For example, see:
> + * https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/kunit-tool.html#configuring-building-and-running-tests
> + * ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config --make_option LLVM=1
> + * ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run overflow [--raw_output] \
As above, this should probably be 'stackinit', not 'overflow'.
> + * --make_option LLVM=1 \
> + * --kconfig_add CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO=y
> *
> * External build example:
> * clang -O2 -Wall -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern \
> - * -o test_stackinit test_stackinit.c
> + * -o stackinit_kunit stackinit_kunit.c
> + * ./stackinit_kunit
> + *
> */
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -18,21 +27,55 @@
> #else
>
> /* Userspace headers. */
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdint.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <stdbool.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <sys/types.h>
>
> /* Linux kernel-ism stubs for stand-alone userspace build. */
> -#define KBUILD_MODNAME "stackinit"
> -#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> -#define pr_err(fmt, ...) fprintf(stderr, pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> -#define pr_warn(fmt, ...) fprintf(stderr, pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> -#define pr_info(fmt, ...) fprintf(stdout, pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> -#define __init /**/
> -#define __exit /**/
> +#define TEST_PASS 0
> +#define TEST_SKIP 1
> +#define TEST_FAIL 2
> +struct kunit {
> + int status;
> + char *msg;
> +};
> +struct kunit_case {
> + void (*run_case)(struct kunit *test);
> + const char *name;
> +};
> +struct kunit_suite {
> + const char *name;
> + const struct kunit_case *test_cases;
> +};
> +#define KUNIT_CASE(test_name) { .run_case = test_name, .name = #test_name }
> +
> +#define KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, expr, fmt, ...) \
> +do { \
> + if (!(expr)) { \
> + if (test->status != TEST_SKIP) \
> + test->status = TEST_FAIL; \
> + if (test->msg) \
> + free(test->msg); \
> + asprintf(&test->msg, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> + } \
> +} while (0)
> +
> +#define KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, (left) == (right), fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +
> +#define kunit_skip(test, fmt, ...) \
> +do { \
> + test->status = TEST_SKIP; \
> + if (test->msg) \
> + free(test->msg); \
> + asprintf(&test->msg, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> +} while (0)
> +
> #define __user /**/
> #define noinline __attribute__((__noinline__))
> #define __aligned(x) __attribute__((__aligned__(x)))
> @@ -59,16 +102,44 @@ typedef uint16_t u16;
> typedef uint32_t u32;
> typedef uint64_t u64;
>
> -#define module_init(func) static int (*do_init)(void) = func
> -#define module_exit(func) static void (*do_exit)(void) = func
> -#define MODULE_LICENSE(str) int main(void) { \
> - int rc; \
> - /* License: str */ \
> - rc = do_init(); \
> - if (rc == 0) \
> - do_exit(); \
> - return rc; \
> - }
> +#define MODULE_LICENSE(str) /* */
> +
> +int do_kunit_test_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> +{
> + const struct kunit_case *test_case;
> + int rc = 0;
> +
> + for (test_case = suite->test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++) {
> + struct kunit test = { };
> +
> + test_case->run_case(&test);
> + switch (test.status) {
> + default:
> + case TEST_FAIL:
> + fprintf(stderr, "FAIL: %s%s%s", test_case->name,
> + test.msg ? ": " : "",
> + test.msg ?: "\n");
> + rc = 1;
> + break;
> + case TEST_SKIP:
> + fprintf(stdout, "XFAIL: %s%s%s", test_case->name,
> + test.msg ? ": " : "",
> + test.msg ?: "\n");
> + break;
> + case TEST_PASS:
> + fprintf(stdout, "ok: %s\n", test_case->name);
> + break;
> + }
> + if (test.msg)
> + free(test.msg);
> + }
> + return rc;
> +}
This whole userspace mini-kunit thing is very neat. Daniel makes some
good points about how it could be extended and made to match KUnit
more (though I don't think we need to make a perfect userland KUnit
for just this test). The one other thing I'll ask is if it makes sense
to have this output something more similar to KTAP. If the target of
the userspace version isn't kernel developers, I don't think it's
necessary, but if there's no reason _not_ to, it'd be nice for it to
be consistent with the kernel version.
> +
> +#define kunit_test_suite(suite) \
> +int main(void) { \
> + return do_kunit_test_suite(&(suite)); \
> +}
>
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>
> @@ -201,7 +272,7 @@ static bool range_contains(char *haystack_start, size_t haystack_size,
> */
> #define DEFINE_TEST_DRIVER(name, var_type, which, xfail) \
> /* Returns 0 on success, 1 on failure. */ \
> -static noinline __init int test_ ## name (void) \
> +static noinline void test_ ## name (struct kunit *test) \
> { \
> var_type zero INIT_CLONE_ ## which; \
> int ignored; \
> @@ -220,10 +291,8 @@ static noinline __init int test_ ## name (void) \
> /* Verify all bytes overwritten with 0xFF. */ \
> for (sum = 0, i = 0; i < target_size; i++) \
> sum += (check_buf[i] != 0xFF); \
> - if (sum) { \
> - pr_err(#name ": leaf fill was not 0xFF!?\n"); \
> - return 1; \
> - } \
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, sum, 0, \
> + "leaf fill was not 0xFF!?\n"); \
As Daniel noted, this is a behaviour change for the userspace version,
as its implementation of KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG() doesn't exit the test
early. So earlier errors will be overwritten with later ones, akin to
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG().
In general, KUnit tests will often use the EXPECT variant where
possible, as KUnit will print all failed expectations out, not just
the last one, so ASSERT is usually reserved for things like memory
allocation failures where continuing is no longer safe. That being
said, it can get a bit spammy, so I'm happy with it either way.
> /* Clear entire check buffer for later bit tests. */ \
> memset(check_buf, 0x00, sizeof(check_buf)); \
> /* Extract stack-defined variable contents. */ \
> @@ -231,32 +300,29 @@ static noinline __init int test_ ## name (void) \
> FETCH_ARG_ ## which(zero)); \
> \
> /* Validate that compiler lined up fill and target. */ \
> - if (!range_contains(fill_start, fill_size, \
> - target_start, target_size)) { \
> - pr_err(#name ": stack fill missed target!?\n"); \
> - pr_err(#name ": fill %zu wide\n", fill_size); \
> - pr_err(#name ": target offset by %d\n", \
> - (int)((ssize_t)(uintptr_t)fill_start - \
> - (ssize_t)(uintptr_t)target_start)); \
> - return 1; \
> - } \
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, \
> + range_contains(fill_start, fill_size, \
> + target_start, target_size), \
> + "stack fill missed target!? " \
> + "(fill %zu wide, target offset by %d)\n", \
> + fill_size, \
> + (int)((ssize_t)(uintptr_t)fill_start - \
> + (ssize_t)(uintptr_t)target_start)); \
> \
> /* Look for any bytes still 0xFF in check region. */ \
> for (sum = 0, i = 0; i < target_size; i++) \
> sum += (check_buf[i] == 0xFF); \
> \
> - if (sum == 0) { \
> - pr_info(#name " ok\n"); \
> - return 0; \
> - } else { \
> - pr_warn(#name " %sFAIL (uninit bytes: %d)\n", \
> - (xfail) ? "X" : "", sum); \
> - return (xfail) ? 0 : 1; \
> - } \
> + if (sum != 0 && xfail) \
> + kunit_skip(test, \
> + "XFAIL uninit bytes: %d\n", \
> + sum); \
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, sum, 0, \
> + "uninit bytes: %d\n", sum); \
> }
> #define DEFINE_TEST(name, var_type, which, init_level, xfail) \
> /* no-op to force compiler into ignoring "uninitialized" vars */\
> -static noinline __init DO_NOTHING_TYPE_ ## which(var_type) \
> +static noinline DO_NOTHING_TYPE_ ## which(var_type) \
> do_nothing_ ## name(var_type *ptr) \
> { \
> /* Will always be true, but compiler doesn't know. */ \
> @@ -265,9 +331,8 @@ do_nothing_ ## name(var_type *ptr) \
> else \
> return DO_NOTHING_RETURN_ ## which(ptr + 1); \
> } \
> -static noinline __init int leaf_ ## name(unsigned long sp, \
> - bool fill, \
> - var_type *arg) \
> +static noinline int leaf_ ## name(unsigned long sp, bool fill, \
> + var_type *arg) \
> { \
> char buf[VAR_BUFFER]; \
> var_type var \
> @@ -398,7 +463,7 @@ static int noinline __leaf_switch_none(int path, bool fill)
> * This is intentionally unreachable. To silence the
> * warning, build with -Wno-switch-unreachable
> */
> - uint64_t var;
> + uint64_t var[10];
>
> case 1:
> target_start = &var;
> @@ -423,19 +488,19 @@ static int noinline __leaf_switch_none(int path, bool fill)
> memcpy(check_buf, target_start, target_size);
> break;
> default:
> - var = 5;
> - return var & forced_mask;
> + var[1] = 5;
> + return var[1] & forced_mask;
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static noinline __init int leaf_switch_1_none(unsigned long sp, bool fill,
> +static noinline int leaf_switch_1_none(unsigned long sp, bool fill,
> uint64_t *arg)
> {
> return __leaf_switch_none(1, fill);
> }
>
> -static noinline __init int leaf_switch_2_none(unsigned long sp, bool fill,
> +static noinline int leaf_switch_2_none(unsigned long sp, bool fill,
> uint64_t *arg)
> {
> return __leaf_switch_none(2, fill);
> @@ -450,65 +515,53 @@ static noinline __init int leaf_switch_2_none(unsigned long sp, bool fill,
> DEFINE_TEST_DRIVER(switch_1_none, uint64_t, SCALAR, XFAIL);
> DEFINE_TEST_DRIVER(switch_2_none, uint64_t, SCALAR, XFAIL);
>
> -static int __init test_stackinit_init(void)
> -{
> - unsigned int failures = 0;
> -
> -#define test_scalars(init) do { \
> - failures += test_u8_ ## init (); \
> - failures += test_u16_ ## init (); \
> - failures += test_u32_ ## init (); \
> - failures += test_u64_ ## init (); \
> - failures += test_char_array_ ## init (); \
> - } while (0)
> +#define KUNIT_test_scalars(init) \
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_u8_ ## init), \
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_u16_ ## init), \
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_u32_ ## init), \
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_u64_ ## init), \
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_char_array_ ## init)
>
> -#define test_structs(init) do { \
> - failures += test_small_hole_ ## init (); \
> - failures += test_big_hole_ ## init (); \
> - failures += test_trailing_hole_ ## init (); \
> - failures += test_packed_ ## init (); \
> - } while (0)
> +#define KUNIT_test_structs(init) \
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_small_hole_ ## init), \
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_big_hole_ ## init), \
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_trailing_hole_ ## init),\
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_packed_ ## init) \
>
> +static struct kunit_case stackinit_test_cases[] = {
> /* These are explicitly initialized and should always pass. */
> - test_scalars(zero);
> - test_structs(zero);
> + KUNIT_test_scalars(zero),
> + KUNIT_test_structs(zero),
> /* Padding here appears to be accidentally always initialized? */
> - test_structs(dynamic_partial);
> - test_structs(assigned_dynamic_partial);
> + KUNIT_test_structs(dynamic_partial),
> + KUNIT_test_structs(assigned_dynamic_partial),
> /* Padding initialization depends on compiler behaviors. */
> - test_structs(static_partial);
> - test_structs(static_all);
> - test_structs(dynamic_all);
> - test_structs(runtime_partial);
> - test_structs(runtime_all);
> - test_structs(assigned_static_partial);
> - test_structs(assigned_static_all);
> - test_structs(assigned_dynamic_all);
> + KUNIT_test_structs(static_partial),
> + KUNIT_test_structs(static_all),
> + KUNIT_test_structs(dynamic_all),
> + KUNIT_test_structs(runtime_partial),
> + KUNIT_test_structs(runtime_all),
> + KUNIT_test_structs(assigned_static_partial),
> + KUNIT_test_structs(assigned_static_all),
> + KUNIT_test_structs(assigned_dynamic_all),
> /* Everything fails this since it effectively performs a memcpy(). */
> - test_structs(assigned_copy);
> -
> + KUNIT_test_structs(assigned_copy),
> /* STRUCTLEAK_BYREF_ALL should cover everything from here down. */
> - test_scalars(none);
> - failures += test_switch_1_none();
> - failures += test_switch_2_none();
> -
> + KUNIT_test_scalars(none),
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_switch_1_none),
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_switch_2_none),
> /* STRUCTLEAK_BYREF should cover from here down. */
> - test_structs(none);
> -
> + KUNIT_test_structs(none),
> /* STRUCTLEAK will only cover this. */
> - failures += test_user();
> -
> - if (failures == 0)
> - pr_info("all tests passed!\n");
> - else
> - pr_err("failures: %u\n", failures);
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_user),
> + {}
> +};
>
> - return failures ? -EINVAL : 0;
> -}
> -module_init(test_stackinit_init);
> +static struct kunit_suite stackinit_test_suite = {
> + .name = "stackinit",
> + .test_cases = stackinit_test_cases,
> +};
>
> -static void __exit test_stackinit_exit(void)
> -{ }
> -module_exit(test_stackinit_exit);
> +kunit_test_suite(stackinit_test_suite);
>
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> --
> 2.30.2
>
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4003 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists