linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: Update jedec,lpddr2 revision-id binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3c199306-62a9-1cc6-f864-6f79869d4bc5@canonical.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:08:02 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: Update jedec,lpddr2 revision-id binding

On 25/02/2022 02:41, Julius Werner wrote:
>>> I bounced the mail to Jonathan, Thierry and linux-tegra (+Cc), so
>>> hopefully they will get it. If not, series might need resend with proper
>>> addresses.
>>
>> Thanks for the bounce. Applied.
> 
> Sorry, I wasn't sure how this was supposed to work for interdependent
> patches, I thought they would all go through the same maintainer tree.
> If you do split them up please be aware of the dependency, i.e. this
> patch should not be applied anywhere without patch 1 and 2 of this
> series landing first.

DTS changes never go with driver changes. Even if within the same tree,
these will be different branches, so you cannot maintain dependency. The
cover letter therefore should mention such dependency, so DTS won't get
applied too fast.

Best regards,
Krzysztof