[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220225084013.GA26647@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 09:40:13 +0100
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: BenoƮt Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/9] dt-bindings: net: add schema for Microchip/SMSC
LAN95xx USB Ethernet controllers
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:18:30AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 08:49:20AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + usb {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + ethernet@1 {
> > + compatible = "usb424,ec00";
>
> If this is a hub/ethernet combo device, how is it valid to be standalone
> without the hub?
What is the best way to describe two type of devices: with and without
hub in package? Have two different schema to keep things simple?
Regards,
Oleksij
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists