linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v1 0/2] VM fork detection for RNG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220225053937-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 25 Feb 2022 05:40:21 -0500
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@...hat.com>,
        Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
        KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        adrian@...ity.io, "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        "Catangiu, Adrian Costin" <acatan@...zon.com>, graf@...zon.com,
        Colm MacCarthaigh <colmmacc@...zon.com>,
        "Singh, Balbir" <sblbir@...zon.com>,
        "Weiss, Radu" <raduweis@...zon.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>, ehabkost@...hat.com,
        ben@...portsystems.com, "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 0/2] VM fork detection for RNG

On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:57:34AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:56 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@...hat.com> wrote:
> > IIRC this part of the QEMU doc was making an implicit assumption
> > about the way QEMU is to be used by mgmt apps doing snapshots.
> >
> > Instead of using the 'loadvm' command on the existing running QEMU
> > process, the doc seems to tacitly expect the management app will
> > throwaway the existing QEMU process and spawn a brand new QEMU
> > process to load the snapshot into, thus getting the new GUID on
> > the QEMU command line.
> 
> Right, exactly. The "there are no known use cases" bit I think just
> forgot about one very common use case that perhaps just wasn't in use
> by the original author. So I'm pretty sure this remains a QEMU bug.
> 
> Jason

Quite possibly yes.

-- 
MST