lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 25 Feb 2022 12:10:44 +0000
From:   Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:     Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] nvmem: core: add cell name based matching of DT
 cell nodes

Hi Rafał

On 18/02/2022 07:07, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
> 
> When adding NVMEM cells defined by driver it's important to match them
> with DT nodes that specify matching names. That way other bindings &
> drivers can reference such "dynamic" NVMEM cells.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
> ---
>   drivers/nvmem/core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index 53a43d843743..a891449c52f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> @@ -499,6 +499,31 @@ static int nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_entry(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +/**
> + * nvmem_find_cell_of_node() - Find DT node matching nvmem cell
> + *
> + * @nvmem: nvmem provider
> + * @name: nvmem cell name
> + *
> + * Runtime created nvmem cells (those not coming from DT) may still need to be
> + * referenced in DT. This function allows finding DT node referencing nvmem cell
> + * by its name. Such a DT node can be then used by nvmem consumers.
> + *
> + * Return: NULL or pointer to DT node
> + */
> +static struct device_node *nvmem_find_cell_of_node(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
> +						   const char *name)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *child;
> +
> +	for_each_child_of_node(nvmem->dev.of_node, child) {
> +		if (!strcmp(child->name, name))
> +			return child;
> +	}

Isn't this just

	return of_get_child_by_name(nvmem->dev.of_node, name);


> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
>   /**
>    * nvmem_add_cells() - Add cell information to an nvmem device
>    *
> @@ -532,6 +557,8 @@ static int nvmem_add_cells(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
>   			goto err;
>   		}
>   
> +		cells[i]->np = nvmem_find_cell_of_node(nvmem, cells[i]->name);


This is really assuming that node name will be same as name passed in 
nvmem_cell_info which might not be always true.

This seems be very specific with brcm and this code does not belong in 
nvmem core.

How about adding device_node to struct nvmem_cell_info and update this 
of_node as part of brcm_nvram_parse()?


--srini


> +
>   		nvmem_cell_entry_add(cells[i]);
>   	}
>   

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ