[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45015436-cc46-a239-e73c-db23e2c161a8@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 12:10:44 +0000
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] nvmem: core: add cell name based matching of DT
cell nodes
Hi Rafał
On 18/02/2022 07:07, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
>
> When adding NVMEM cells defined by driver it's important to match them
> with DT nodes that specify matching names. That way other bindings &
> drivers can reference such "dynamic" NVMEM cells.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
> ---
> drivers/nvmem/core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index 53a43d843743..a891449c52f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> @@ -499,6 +499,31 @@ static int nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_entry(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * nvmem_find_cell_of_node() - Find DT node matching nvmem cell
> + *
> + * @nvmem: nvmem provider
> + * @name: nvmem cell name
> + *
> + * Runtime created nvmem cells (those not coming from DT) may still need to be
> + * referenced in DT. This function allows finding DT node referencing nvmem cell
> + * by its name. Such a DT node can be then used by nvmem consumers.
> + *
> + * Return: NULL or pointer to DT node
> + */
> +static struct device_node *nvmem_find_cell_of_node(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
> + const char *name)
> +{
> + struct device_node *child;
> +
> + for_each_child_of_node(nvmem->dev.of_node, child) {
> + if (!strcmp(child->name, name))
> + return child;
> + }
Isn't this just
return of_get_child_by_name(nvmem->dev.of_node, name);
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * nvmem_add_cells() - Add cell information to an nvmem device
> *
> @@ -532,6 +557,8 @@ static int nvmem_add_cells(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
> goto err;
> }
>
> + cells[i]->np = nvmem_find_cell_of_node(nvmem, cells[i]->name);
This is really assuming that node name will be same as name passed in
nvmem_cell_info which might not be always true.
This seems be very specific with brcm and this code does not belong in
nvmem core.
How about adding device_node to struct nvmem_cell_info and update this
of_node as part of brcm_nvram_parse()?
--srini
> +
> nvmem_cell_entry_add(cells[i]);
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists