| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20220225123051.xlsv7fkesdf5upeh@pali>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 13:30:51 +0100
From: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] PCI: Add function for parsing
'slot-power-limit-milliwatt' DT property
On Thursday 24 February 2022 14:47:15 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 05:31:56PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Add function of_pci_get_slot_power_limit(), which parses the
> > 'slot-power-limit-milliwatt' DT property, returning the value in
> > milliwatts and in format ready for the PCIe Slot Capabilities Register.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/of.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/pci/pci.h | 15 +++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
> > index cb2e8351c2cc..2b0c0a3641a8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/of.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
> > @@ -633,3 +633,67 @@ int of_pci_get_max_link_speed(struct device_node *node)
> > return max_link_speed;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pci_get_max_link_speed);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * of_pci_get_slot_power_limit - Parses the "slot-power-limit-milliwatt"
> > + * property.
> > + *
> > + * @node: device tree node with the slot power limit information
> > + * @slot_power_limit_value: pointer where the value should be stored in PCIe
> > + * Slot Capabilities Register format
> > + * @slot_power_limit_scale: pointer where the scale should be stored in PCIe
> > + * Slot Capabilities Register format
> > + *
> > + * Returns the slot power limit in milliwatts and if @slot_power_limit_value
> > + * and @slot_power_limit_scale pointers are non-NULL, fills in the value and
> > + * scale in format used by PCIe Slot Capabilities Register.
> > + *
> > + * If the property is not found or is invalid, returns 0.
> > + */
> > +u32 of_pci_get_slot_power_limit(struct device_node *node,
> > + u8 *slot_power_limit_value,
> > + u8 *slot_power_limit_scale)
> > +{
> > + u32 slot_power_limit;
>
> Including "mw" or similar reference to the units would give a hint of
> how to relate the code to the spec.
>
> > + u8 value, scale;
> > +
> > + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "slot-power-limit-milliwatt",
> > + &slot_power_limit))
> > + slot_power_limit = 0;
> > +
> > + /* Calculate Slot Power Limit Value and Slot Power Limit Scale */
>
> Add a spec reference to PCIe r6.0, sec 7.5.3.9. IIUC, this supports
> up to 300W, which was what r5.0 defined, but r6.0 added values up to
> 0xfe (600W).
I did not know about it and I have not seen/read r6.0.
It would be nice if somebody with access to r6.0 send a patch to lspci
utility, so we could write support for 600W based on lspci parser.
> > + if (slot_power_limit == 0) {
> > + value = 0x00;
> > + scale = 0;
> > + } else if (slot_power_limit <= 255) {
> > + value = slot_power_limit;
> > + scale = 3;
> > + } else if (slot_power_limit <= 255*10) {
> > + value = slot_power_limit / 10;
> > + scale = 2;
> > + } else if (slot_power_limit <= 255*100) {
> > + value = slot_power_limit / 100;
> > + scale = 1;
> > + } else if (slot_power_limit <= 239*1000) {
> > + value = slot_power_limit / 1000;
> > + scale = 0;
> > + } else if (slot_power_limit <= 250*1000) {
> > + value = 0xF0;
> > + scale = 0;
> > + } else if (slot_power_limit <= 275*1000) {
> > + value = 0xF1;
> > + scale = 0;
> > + } else {
> > + value = 0xF2;
> > + scale = 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (slot_power_limit_value)
> > + *slot_power_limit_value = value;
> > +
> > + if (slot_power_limit_scale)
> > + *slot_power_limit_scale = scale;
> > +
> > + return slot_power_limit;
>
> If "slot-power-limit-milliwatt" contains a value larger than can be
> represented in "value" and "scale", the return value will not agree
> with value/scale, will it?
In previous version 0xF2 was reserved for values above 275 W. So for me
it looked like a correct solution.
> Currently you only use the return value for a log message, so no real
> harm yet, other than the fact that we might print "Slot power limit
> 1000.0W" when the hardware will only advertise 600W available.
>
> Also, if "slot-power-limit-milliwatt" contains something like
> 260000 mW (260 W), we'll return 0xF1/0, so the hardware will
> advertise 275 W available.
There is no way how to encode 260 W. It is possible only 250 W or 275 W,
and nothing between. I chose to round value to upper limit. What do you
prefer in these cases? Upper or lower limit?
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pci_get_slot_power_limit);
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> > index 3d60cabde1a1..e10cdec6c56e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> > @@ -627,6 +627,9 @@ struct device_node;
> > int of_pci_parse_bus_range(struct device_node *node, struct resource *res);
> > int of_get_pci_domain_nr(struct device_node *node);
> > int of_pci_get_max_link_speed(struct device_node *node);
> > +u32 of_pci_get_slot_power_limit(struct device_node *node,
> > + u8 *slot_power_limit_value,
> > + u8 *slot_power_limit_scale);
> > void pci_set_of_node(struct pci_dev *dev);
> > void pci_release_of_node(struct pci_dev *dev);
> > void pci_set_bus_of_node(struct pci_bus *bus);
> > @@ -653,6 +656,18 @@ of_pci_get_max_link_speed(struct device_node *node)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline u32
> > +of_pci_get_slot_power_limit(struct device_node *node,
> > + u8 *slot_power_limit_value,
> > + u8 *slot_power_limit_scale)
> > +{
> > + if (slot_power_limit_value)
> > + *slot_power_limit_value = 0;
> > + if (slot_power_limit_scale)
> > + *slot_power_limit_scale = 0;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline void pci_set_of_node(struct pci_dev *dev) { }
> > static inline void pci_release_of_node(struct pci_dev *dev) { }
> > static inline void pci_set_bus_of_node(struct pci_bus *bus) { }
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists