[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <cover.1645797329.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:55:33 +0100
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, monstr@...str.eu,
michal.simek@...inx.com, git@...inx.com
Cc: Mahesh Bodapati <mbodapat@...inx.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] microblaze: Fix issues with freestanding
Hi,
with GCC 10 there is issue with simple memset implementation which is
called recursively. There are couple of discussions about it and the first
two patches are trying to workaround this.
The third patch only removes simple implementations from arch code and use
generic one which is the same.
Thanks,
Michal
I sent only 1 patch in v1 that's why sending v2 with all 3.
Changes in v2:
- missing patch in v1
- missing patch in v1
Michal Simek (3):
microblaze: Use simple memset implementation from lib/string.c
microblaze: Do loop unrolling for optimized memset implementation
microblaze: Use simple memmove/memcpy implementation from lib/string.c
arch/microblaze/include/asm/string.h | 2 ++
arch/microblaze/lib/memcpy.c | 18 ++-------------
arch/microblaze/lib/memmove.c | 29 ++----------------------
arch/microblaze/lib/memset.c | 33 ++++++++++++----------------
4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists