[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce6cf9f3-0543-c9af-b5cf-bf166c974ad7@xilinx.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:56:10 +0100
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <monstr@...str.eu>,
<git@...inx.com>
CC: Mahesh Bodapati <mbodapat@...inx.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] microblaze: Fix issues with freestanding
On 2/25/22 14:50, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with GCC 10 there is issue with simple memset implementation which is
> called recursively. There are couple of discussions about it and the first
> two patches are trying to workaround this.
> The third patch only removes simple implementations from arch code and use
> generic one which is the same.
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
>
>
> Michal Simek (1):
> microblaze: Use simple memmove/memcpy implementation from lib/string.c
>
> arch/microblaze/include/asm/string.h | 2 +-
> arch/microblaze/lib/memcpy.c | 18 ++---------------
> arch/microblaze/lib/memmove.c | 29 ++--------------------------
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
I didn't send all 3 patches. Sorry about it. V2 has all required changes.
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists