[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <38b6a762bea2cdbe5e761daf5dbc351b18f28de3.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:42:25 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@...el.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Hu <robert.hu@...el.com>, Gao Chao <chao.gao@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/9] KVM: x86: lapic: don't allow to change APIC ID
unconditionally
On Fri, 2022-02-25 at 17:11 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-02-25 at 14:56 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-02-25 at 16:46 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > Assuming that this is approved and accepted upstream,
> > > that is even better that my proposal of doing this
> > > when APICv is enabled.
> > >
> > > Since now apic id is always read only, now we should not
> > > forget to clean up some parts of kvm like kvm_recalculate_apic_map,
> > > which are not needed anymore
> >
> > Can we also now optimise kvm_get_vcpu_by_id() so it doesn't have to do
> > a linear search over all the vCPUs when there isn't a 1:1
> > correspondence with the vCPU index?
>
> I don't think so since vcpu id can still be set by userspace to anything,
> and this is even used to encode topology in it.
Yes, but it can only be set at vCPU creation time and it has to be
unique.
> However a hash table can still be used there to speed it up regardless of
> read-only apic id IMHO.
>
> Or, even better than a hash table, I see that KVM already
> limits vcpu_id to KVM_MAX_VCPUS * 4 with a comment that only two extra
> bits of topology are used:
We already have the kvm_apic_map which provides a fast lookup. The key
point here is that the APIC ID can't *change* from vcpu->vcpu_id any
more, so we can actually use the kvm_apic_map for kvm_get_vcpu_by_id()
now, can't we?
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (5965 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists