linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4] fget: clarify and improve __fget

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220226063344.168806-1-libaokun1@huawei.com>
Date:   Sat, 26 Feb 2022 14:33:44 +0800
From:   Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
To:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        <oliver.sang@...el.com>, <beibei.si@...el.com>, <jannh@...gle.com>,
        <mszeredi@...hat.com>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <libaokun1@...wei.com>, <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4] fget: clarify and improve __fget_files() implementation

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>

commit e386dfc56f837da66d00a078e5314bc8382fab83 upstream.

Commit 054aa8d439b9 ("fget: check that the fd still exists after getting
a ref to it") fixed a race with getting a reference to a file just as it
was being closed.  It was a fairly minimal patch, and I didn't think
re-checking the file pointer lookup would be a measurable overhead,
since it was all right there and cached.

But I was wrong, as pointed out by the kernel test robot.

The 'poll2' case of the will-it-scale.per_thread_ops benchmark regressed
quite noticeably.  Admittedly it seems to be a very artificial test:
doing "poll()" system calls on regular files in a very tight loop in
multiple threads.

That means that basically all the time is spent just looking up file
descriptors without ever doing anything useful with them (not that doing
'poll()' on a regular file is useful to begin with).  And as a result it
shows the extra "re-check fd" cost as a sore thumb.

Happily, the regression is fixable by just writing the code to loook up
the fd to be better and clearer.  There's still a cost to verify the
file pointer, but now it's basically in the noise even for that
benchmark that does nothing else - and the code is more understandable
and has better comments too.

[ Side note: this patch is also a classic case of one that looks very
  messy with the default greedy Myers diff - it's much more legible with
  either the patience of histogram diff algorithm ]

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211210053743.GA36420@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211213083154.GA20853@linux.intel.com/
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Tested-by: Carel Si <beibei.si@...el.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
---
 fs/file.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
index 0ed602e1fbd2..3ab8eefa7077 100644
--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -691,28 +691,69 @@ void do_close_on_exec(struct files_struct *files)
 	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
 }
 
-static struct file *__fget(unsigned int fd, fmode_t mask, unsigned int refs)
+static inline struct file *__fget_files_rcu(struct files_struct *files,
+		unsigned int fd, fmode_t mask, unsigned int refs)
 {
-	struct files_struct *files = current->files;
-	struct file *file;
+	for (;;) {
+		struct file *file;
+		struct fdtable *fdt = rcu_dereference_raw(files->fdt);
+		struct file __rcu **fdentry;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
-loop:
-	file = fcheck_files(files, fd);
-	if (file) {
-		/* File object ref couldn't be taken.
-		 * dup2() atomicity guarantee is the reason
-		 * we loop to catch the new file (or NULL pointer)
+		if (unlikely(fd >= fdt->max_fds))
+			return NULL;
+
+		fdentry = fdt->fd + array_index_nospec(fd, fdt->max_fds);
+		file = rcu_dereference_raw(*fdentry);
+		if (unlikely(!file))
+			return NULL;
+
+		if (unlikely(file->f_mode & mask))
+			return NULL;
+
+		/*
+		 * Ok, we have a file pointer. However, because we do
+		 * this all locklessly under RCU, we may be racing with
+		 * that file being closed.
+		 *
+		 * Such a race can take two forms:
+		 *
+		 *  (a) the file ref already went down to zero,
+		 *      and get_file_rcu_many() fails. Just try
+		 *      again:
+		 */
+		if (unlikely(!get_file_rcu_many(file, refs)))
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 *  (b) the file table entry has changed under us.
+		 *       Note that we don't need to re-check the 'fdt->fd'
+		 *       pointer having changed, because it always goes
+		 *       hand-in-hand with 'fdt'.
+		 *
+		 * If so, we need to put our refs and try again.
 		 */
-		if (file->f_mode & mask)
-			file = NULL;
-		else if (!get_file_rcu_many(file, refs))
-			goto loop;
-		else if (__fcheck_files(files, fd) != file) {
+		if (unlikely(rcu_dereference_raw(files->fdt) != fdt) ||
+		    unlikely(rcu_dereference_raw(*fdentry) != file)) {
 			fput_many(file, refs);
-			goto loop;
+			continue;
 		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Ok, we have a ref to the file, and checked that it
+		 * still exists.
+		 */
+		return file;
 	}
+}
+
+
+static struct file *__fget(unsigned int fd, fmode_t mask, unsigned int refs)
+{
+	struct files_struct *files = current->files;
+	struct file *file;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	file = __fget_files_rcu(files, fd, mask, refs);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return file;
-- 
2.31.1