[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220226095452.16924-1-lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2022 17:54:52 +0800
From: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@...iatek.com>
To: <pmladek@...e.com>
CC: <acme@...nel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <jolsa@...hat.com>, <jthierry@...hat.com>,
<keescook@...omium.org>, <kernelfans@...il.com>,
<lecopzer.chen@...iatek.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<masahiroy@...nel.org>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <maz@...nel.org>,
<mcgrof@...nel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <namhyung@...nel.org>,
<nixiaoming@...wei.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>, <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
<wangqing@...o.com>, <will@...nel.org>, <yj.chiang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] kernel/watchdog: change watchdog_nmi_enable() to void
> On Sat 2022-02-12 18:43:46, Lecopzer Chen wrote:
> >
> > Nobody cares about the return value of watchdog_nmi_enable(),
> > changing its prototype to void.
> >
> > --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c
> > +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c
> > @@ -282,11 +282,11 @@ __setup("nmi_watchdog=", setup_nmi_watchdog);
> > * sparc specific NMI watchdog enable function.
> > * Enables watchdog if it is not enabled already.
> > */
> > -int watchdog_nmi_enable(unsigned int cpu)
> > +void watchdog_nmi_enable(unsigned int cpu)
> > {
> > if (atomic_read(&nmi_active) == -1) {
> > pr_warn("NMI watchdog cannot be enabled or disabled\n");
> > - return -1;
> > + return;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -295,11 +295,11 @@ int watchdog_nmi_enable(unsigned int cpu)
> > * process first.
> > */
> > if (!nmi_init_done)
> > - return 0;
> > + return;
> >
> > smp_call_function_single(cpu, start_nmi_watchdog, NULL, 1);
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return;
>
> Return at the end of the function is superfluous.
Thanks, I'll fix in the next patch.
>
> > }
> > /*
> > * sparc specific NMI watchdog disable function.
>
> Otherwise, it looks good.
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists