lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220226001546.360188-11-seanjc@google.com>
Date:   Sat, 26 Feb 2022 00:15:28 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
        Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
        Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 10/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Add helpers to read/write TDP MMU
 SPTEs and document RCU

Add helpers to read and write TDP MMU SPTEs instead of open coding
rcu_dereference() all over the place, and to provide a convenient
location to document why KVM doesn't exempt holding mmu_lock for write
from having to hold RCU (and any future changes to the rules).

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c |  6 +++---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c  |  6 +++---
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c
index be3f096db2eb..6d3b3e5a5533 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ static void tdp_iter_refresh_sptep(struct tdp_iter *iter)
 {
 	iter->sptep = iter->pt_path[iter->level - 1] +
 		SHADOW_PT_INDEX(iter->gfn << PAGE_SHIFT, iter->level);
-	iter->old_spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter->sptep));
+	iter->old_spte = kvm_tdp_mmu_read_spte(iter->sptep);
 }
 
 static gfn_t round_gfn_for_level(gfn_t gfn, int level)
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static bool try_step_down(struct tdp_iter *iter)
 	 * Reread the SPTE before stepping down to avoid traversing into page
 	 * tables that are no longer linked from this entry.
 	 */
-	iter->old_spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter->sptep));
+	iter->old_spte = kvm_tdp_mmu_read_spte(iter->sptep);
 
 	child_pt = spte_to_child_pt(iter->old_spte, iter->level);
 	if (!child_pt)
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static bool try_step_side(struct tdp_iter *iter)
 	iter->gfn += KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(iter->level);
 	iter->next_last_level_gfn = iter->gfn;
 	iter->sptep++;
-	iter->old_spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter->sptep));
+	iter->old_spte = kvm_tdp_mmu_read_spte(iter->sptep);
 
 	return true;
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
index 216ebbe76ddd..bb9b581f1ee4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
@@ -9,6 +9,22 @@
 
 typedef u64 __rcu *tdp_ptep_t;
 
+/*
+ * TDP MMU SPTEs are RCU protected to allow paging structures (non-leaf SPTEs)
+ * to be zapped while holding mmu_lock for read.  Holding RCU isn't required for
+ * correctness if mmu_lock is held for write, but plumbing "struct kvm" down to
+ * the lower depths of the TDP MMU just to make lockdep happy is a nightmare, so
+ * all accesses to SPTEs are done under RCU protection.
+ */
+static inline u64 kvm_tdp_mmu_read_spte(tdp_ptep_t sptep)
+{
+	return READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(sptep));
+}
+static inline void kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 val)
+{
+	WRITE_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(sptep), val);
+}
+
 /*
  * A TDP iterator performs a pre-order walk over a TDP paging structure.
  */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 4f460782a848..8fbf3364f116 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static inline int tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
 	 * here since the SPTE is going from non-present
 	 * to non-present.
 	 */
-	WRITE_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter->sptep), 0);
+	kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(iter->sptep, 0);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ static inline void __tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
 	 */
 	WARN_ON(is_removed_spte(iter->old_spte));
 
-	WRITE_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter->sptep), new_spte);
+	kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(iter->sptep, new_spte);
 
 	__handle_changed_spte(kvm, iter->as_id, iter->gfn, iter->old_spte,
 			      new_spte, iter->level, false);
@@ -1046,7 +1046,7 @@ int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
 			 * because the new value informs the !present
 			 * path below.
 			 */
-			iter.old_spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter.sptep));
+			iter.old_spte = kvm_tdp_mmu_read_spte(iter.sptep);
 		}
 
 		if (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte)) {
-- 
2.35.1.574.g5d30c73bfb-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ