[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8c6391ce70ad5940b4951e3329b4f525e12252e.camel@sylv.io>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2022 16:32:37 +0100
From: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <sylv@...v.io>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] hwmon (xdpe12284): Add support for xdpe11280
On Fri, 2022-02-25 at 08:39 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/21/22 04:13, sylv wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-02-17 at 11:25 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 2/17/22 10:38, sylv wrote:
> > > [ ... ]
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > That makes me wonder if the chip needs to be added to this
> > > > > driver
> > > > > in
> > > > > the first
> > > > > place, or if it could be added to pmbus.c instead. Any idea ?
> > > >
> > > > Oh, we did wrote a standalone driver too, and it works fine.
> > > > Maybe it's better to upsteam it instead. :)
> > >
> > > No, I meant if it would make sense to just add something like
> > >
> > > {"xdpe11280", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one },
> > >
> > > to drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.c.
> > >
> > > You only really need a standalone driver if it does something
> > > special, such as a workaround for some register access (like
> > > the xdpe12284 driver), or if support for manufacturer specific
> > > registers is desired or needed. That would, for example, be
> > > useful
> > > if the xdpe11280 supports per-phase sensors.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Guenter
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tested if the xdpe11280 can use the generic pmbus driver.
> > Everything
> > works fine except it does only detect READ_TEMPERATURE_1 on page 0.
> > Looking at the pmbus_find_sensor_groups function it looks like only
> > some commands are probed on each page (READ_VOUT, READ_IOUT, and
> > READ_POUT) but not READ_TEMPERATURE_1.
> > The PMBus spec 1.3.1 tells us: "Each page may offer the full range
> > of
> > PMBus commands available for each output or non-PMBus device." How
> > could we adapt the generic driver so that it is possible to probe
> > commands for each page?
> >
>
> The problem is the "may". Some chips don't implement multi-page
> support especially for temperature sensors. So we'll have to go
> with adding support to the existing driver.
>
> Guenter
sgtm. So I'll continue working on this patch set.
>
> > Furthermore, It would be great to add regulator and DT support. I
> > created a WIP branch on GitHub with a possible way to implement
> > this:
> > https://github.com/9elements/linux/tree/upstreaming_pmbus_regulator_wip
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marcello
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists