linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] ACPI: allow longer device IDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b023481d-7a25-2343-63d9-0a34874f2ba8@amazon.com>
Date:   Sun, 27 Feb 2022 12:38:41 +0100
From:   Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
CC:     Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        "ACPI Devel Maling List" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] ACPI: allow longer device IDs


On 27.02.22 11:47, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 at 11:30, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 at 11:03, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
>>> On 2/27/22, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 26 Feb 2022 at 23:07, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
>>>>> From: Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>
>>>>>
>>>> Please don't invent patch authors like that. Alex's patch that started
>>>> this discussion was completely different.
>>> Considering the investigative side ("why won't the _CID match?") and
>>> most the commit message were Alex's, and that those things comprise
>>> 95% of what this patch is, and that the code change itself isn't even
>>> part of anything Turing complete, I most certainly did not feel
>>> comfortable stripping Alex's authorship. Instead I added myself as a
>>> co-author at the bottom. When in doubt, err on the side of crediting
>>> others. Alex also took a look at this patch, I am under the impression
>>> of at least, before it went out. Let's minimize the paperwork
>>> policing, okay? I think it'd make for a much more pleasant space here.
> ...
>> Please stop with the ad hominems in response to criticism on factual
>> aspects of your code. Putting someone else's authorship on code they
>> did not write is not cool, and pointing that out is *not* what is
>> making this space unpleasant.
>> And 'paperwork policing' is sadly an important aspect of a high
>> profile open source project such as Linux.
>>
> I typed this before reading your message on IRC, which reads:
>
> "Alex looked at that patch before i sent it out and did not object to
> me keeping his authorship. I wouldn't have sent it out otherwise."
>
> and so I stand corrected if this is true. But please, next time,
> please be more clear about these things.


Yes, he did reach out to me on a separate channel and I told him to go 
for it :). Sorry if I created some confusion with that.


Thanks,

Alex





Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Krausenstr. 38
10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 149173 B
Sitz: Berlin
Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879