linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: host: ehci-sunplus: Add driver for ehci in Sunplus SP7021

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 27 Feb 2022 11:07:37 -0500
From:   Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:     Vincent Shih <vincent.sunplus@...il.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        wells.lu@...plus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: host: ehci-sunplus: Add driver for ehci in
 Sunplus SP7021

On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 05:50:40PM +0800, Vincent Shih wrote:
> Add driver for ehci in Sunplus SP7021
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Shih <vincent.sunplus@...il.com>
> ---

> +static struct usb_ehci_pdata usb_ehci_pdata = {
> +};
> +
> +static int ehci_sunplus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct sp_ehci_priv *sp_priv;
> +	struct resource *res_mem;
> +	struct usb_hcd *hcd;
> +	int irq, ret;
> +
> +	if (usb_disabled())
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	pdev->dev.platform_data = &usb_ehci_pdata;

What reason is there for doing this?  I can't see any justification for 
storing a pointer to data that contains nothing but zeros.

Alan Stern