[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <572369c5-85e4-75af-85f4-d150c25e75fd@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 08:29:36 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Yixuan Cao <caoyixuan2019@...il.szu.edu.cn>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc.c: fix a comment
On 2/27/22 00:45, Yixuan Cao wrote:
> Dear Sir/Madam,
>
> The sentence
> "but the mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving"
> should be rephrased with
> "but the mempolicy wants to alloc memory by interleaving"
> where "mempolicy" is a struct name.
>
> Thanks and best regards,
> Yixuan Cao
>
> Signed-off-by: Yixuan Cao <caoyixuan2019@...il.szu.edu.cn>
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index b454cf1a261f..89d48d8eb20c 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2905,7 +2905,7 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid,
> /* memory allocation should consider mempolicy, we can't
> * wrongly use nearest node when nid == NUMA_NO_NODE,
> * otherwise memory may be allocated in only one node,
> - * but mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving.
> + * but mempolicy want to alloc memory by interleaving.
s/want/wants/
as in your commentary above.
> */
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) && nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> nr = alloc_pages_bulk_array_mempolicy(bulk_gfp,
thanks.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists