[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5477fb05-d72f-ccc0-1c07-8f2f40d9dde0@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 18:01:47 +0100
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
nathan@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, ardeleanalex@...il.com,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: mt6360: strengthen return check of
mt6360_adc_read_channel
Le 27/02/2022 à 17:43, trix-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@...lic.gmane.org a
écrit :
> From: Tom Rix <trix-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@...lic.gmane.org>
>
> Clang static analysis reports this issue
> mt6360-adc.c:277:20: warning: Assigned value is
> garbage or undefined
> data.values[i++] = val;
> ^ ~~~
>
> val is set by a successful call to m6360_adc_read_channel().
> A negative return is checked but within m6360_adc_read_channel,
> a non zero check is done.
> Strengthen the check to non zero.
Hi, my understanding of m6360_adc_read_channel() is that on success, it
returns IIO_VAL_INT (i.e. 1).
So, I think that with your patch, we will now always fail because 'ret'
is never 0 at this point.
CJ
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@...lic.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/mt6360-adc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/mt6360-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/mt6360-adc.c
> index 07c0e67683910..9fb6dc305a392 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/mt6360-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/mt6360-adc.c
> @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mt6360_adc_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data));
> for_each_set_bit(bit, indio_dev->active_scan_mask, indio_dev->masklength) {
> ret = mt6360_adc_read_channel(mad, bit, &val);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> + if (ret) {
> dev_warn(&indio_dev->dev, "Failed to get channel %d conversion val\n", bit);
> goto out;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists