[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNATVs-yRX4PnURkLv3fz3gAnuzG2GxZ2gdvmJX2g+0P-_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 02:02:53 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...a.pv.it>,
Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>, Hu Haowen <src.res@...il.cn>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc-tw-discuss@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] Kbuild: move to -std=gnu11
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 7:32 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> During a patch discussion, Linus brought up the option of changing
> the C standard version from gnu89 to gnu99, which allows using variable
> declaration inside of a for() loop. While the C99, C11 and later standards
> introduce many other features, most of these are already available in
> gnu89 as GNU extensions as well.
>
> An earlier attempt to do this when gcc-5 started defaulting to
> -std=gnu11 failed because at the time that caused warnings about
> designated initializers with older compilers. Now that gcc-5.1 is the
> minimum compiler version used for building kernels, that is no longer a
> concern. Similarly, the behavior of 'inline' functions changes between
> gnu89 and gnu11, but this was taken care of by defining 'inline' to
> include __attribute__((gnu_inline)) in order to allow building with
> clang a while ago.
>
> One minor issue that remains is an added gcc warning for shifts of
> negative integers when building with -Werror, which happens with the
Is this a typo?
building with -Werror, ...
->
building with -Wextra, ...
> 'make W=1' option, as well as for three drivers in the kernel that always
> enable -Werror, but it was only observed with the i915 driver so far.
Same here.
enable -Werror, but ...
->
enable -Wextra, but ...
Otherwise,
Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Please let me know if you want me to pick up this.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists