linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 02/29] vhost/vsock: dont check owner in vhost_vsock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220228172141.981731348@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Feb 2022 18:23:29 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+1e3ea63db39f2b4440e0@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        syzbot+3140b17cb44a7b174008@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 02/29] vhost/vsock: dont check owner in vhost_vsock_stop() while releasing

From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>

commit a58da53ffd70294ebea8ecd0eb45fd0d74add9f9 upstream.

vhost_vsock_stop() calls vhost_dev_check_owner() to check the device
ownership. It expects current->mm to be valid.

vhost_vsock_stop() is also called by vhost_vsock_dev_release() when
the user has not done close(), so when we are in do_exit(). In this
case current->mm is invalid and we're releasing the device, so we
should clean it anyway.

Let's check the owner only when vhost_vsock_stop() is called
by an ioctl.

When invoked from release we can not fail so we don't check return
code of vhost_vsock_stop(). We need to stop vsock even if it's not
the owner.

Fixes: 433fc58e6bf2 ("VSOCK: Introduce vhost_vsock.ko")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reported-by: syzbot+1e3ea63db39f2b4440e0@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+3140b17cb44a7b174008@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/vhost/vsock.c |   21 ++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
@@ -484,16 +484,18 @@ err:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int vhost_vsock_stop(struct vhost_vsock *vsock)
+static int vhost_vsock_stop(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, bool check_owner)
 {
 	size_t i;
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
 
-	ret = vhost_dev_check_owner(&vsock->dev);
-	if (ret)
-		goto err;
+	if (check_owner) {
+		ret = vhost_dev_check_owner(&vsock->dev);
+		if (ret)
+			goto err;
+	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vsock->vqs); i++) {
 		struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &vsock->vqs[i];
@@ -611,7 +613,12 @@ static int vhost_vsock_dev_release(struc
 	 * inefficient.  Room for improvement here. */
 	vsock_for_each_connected_socket(vhost_vsock_reset_orphans);
 
-	vhost_vsock_stop(vsock);
+	/* Don't check the owner, because we are in the release path, so we
+	 * need to stop the vsock device in any case.
+	 * vhost_vsock_stop() can not fail in this case, so we don't need to
+	 * check the return code.
+	 */
+	vhost_vsock_stop(vsock, false);
 	vhost_vsock_flush(vsock);
 	vhost_dev_stop(&vsock->dev);
 
@@ -709,7 +716,7 @@ static long vhost_vsock_dev_ioctl(struct
 		if (start)
 			return vhost_vsock_start(vsock);
 		else
-			return vhost_vsock_stop(vsock);
+			return vhost_vsock_stop(vsock, true);
 	case VHOST_GET_FEATURES:
 		features = VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES;
 		if (copy_to_user(argp, &features, sizeof(features)))