[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220228172316.633802535@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 18:24:23 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...dia.com>,
Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 42/80] net/mlx5: Fix possible deadlock on rule deletion
From: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...dia.com>
commit b645e57debca846f51b3209907546ea857ddd3f5 upstream.
Add missing call to up_write_ref_node() which releases the semaphore
in case the FTE doesn't have destinations, such in drop rule case.
Fixes: 465e7baab6d9 ("net/mlx5: Fix deletion of duplicate rules")
Signed-off-by: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c
@@ -2034,6 +2034,8 @@ void mlx5_del_flow_rules(struct mlx5_flo
fte->node.del_hw_func = NULL;
up_write_ref_node(&fte->node, false);
tree_put_node(&fte->node, false);
+ } else {
+ up_write_ref_node(&fte->node, false);
}
kfree(handle);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists