lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220228172318.001204707@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Feb 2022 18:24:33 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
        Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
        "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 52/80] tracing: Have traceon and traceoff trigger honor the instance

From: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>

commit 302e9edd54985f584cfc180098f3554774126969 upstream.

If a trigger is set on an event to disable or enable tracing within an
instance, then tracing should be disabled or enabled in the instance and
not at the top level, which is confusing to users.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220223223837.14f94ec3@rorschach.local.home

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: ae63b31e4d0e2 ("tracing: Separate out trace events from global variables")
Tested-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c |   52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
@@ -940,6 +940,16 @@ static void
 traceon_trigger(struct event_trigger_data *data, void *rec,
 		struct ring_buffer_event *event)
 {
+	struct trace_event_file *file = data->private_data;
+
+	if (file) {
+		if (tracer_tracing_is_on(file->tr))
+			return;
+
+		tracer_tracing_on(file->tr);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	if (tracing_is_on())
 		return;
 
@@ -950,8 +960,15 @@ static void
 traceon_count_trigger(struct event_trigger_data *data, void *rec,
 		      struct ring_buffer_event *event)
 {
-	if (tracing_is_on())
-		return;
+	struct trace_event_file *file = data->private_data;
+
+	if (file) {
+		if (tracer_tracing_is_on(file->tr))
+			return;
+	} else {
+		if (tracing_is_on())
+			return;
+	}
 
 	if (!data->count)
 		return;
@@ -959,13 +976,26 @@ traceon_count_trigger(struct event_trigg
 	if (data->count != -1)
 		(data->count)--;
 
-	tracing_on();
+	if (file)
+		tracer_tracing_on(file->tr);
+	else
+		tracing_on();
 }
 
 static void
 traceoff_trigger(struct event_trigger_data *data, void *rec,
 		 struct ring_buffer_event *event)
 {
+	struct trace_event_file *file = data->private_data;
+
+	if (file) {
+		if (!tracer_tracing_is_on(file->tr))
+			return;
+
+		tracer_tracing_off(file->tr);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	if (!tracing_is_on())
 		return;
 
@@ -976,8 +1006,15 @@ static void
 traceoff_count_trigger(struct event_trigger_data *data, void *rec,
 		       struct ring_buffer_event *event)
 {
-	if (!tracing_is_on())
-		return;
+	struct trace_event_file *file = data->private_data;
+
+	if (file) {
+		if (!tracer_tracing_is_on(file->tr))
+			return;
+	} else {
+		if (!tracing_is_on())
+			return;
+	}
 
 	if (!data->count)
 		return;
@@ -985,7 +1022,10 @@ traceoff_count_trigger(struct event_trig
 	if (data->count != -1)
 		(data->count)--;
 
-	tracing_off();
+	if (file)
+		tracer_tracing_off(file->tr);
+	else
+		tracing_off();
 }
 
 static int


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ