linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH sysctl-next] kernel/kexec_core: move kexec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220228031801.GB150756@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date:   Mon, 28 Feb 2022 11:18:01 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        yingelin <yingelin@...wei.com>
Cc:     ebiederm@...ssion.com, keescook@...omium.org, yzaikin@...gle.com,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, zengweilin@...wei.com,
        chenjianguo3@...wei.com, nixiaoming@...wei.com,
        qiuguorui1@...wei.com, young.liuyang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH sysctl-next] kernel/kexec_core: move kexec_core sysctls
 into its own file

On 02/28/22 at 09:43am, yingelin wrote:
> 
> 在 2022/2/27 4:20, Luis Chamberlain 写道:
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 10:35:21AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > That seems to be an issue everything related to sysctl are all added to
> > > kernel/sysctl.c. Do you have a pointer that someone complained about it
> > > and people agree to scatter them into their own component code?
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220226031054.47DF8C340E7@smtp.kernel.org
> > 
> > > I understand your concern now, I am personally not confused by that
> > > maybe because I haven't got stuff adding or changing into sysctls. My
> > > concern is if we only care and move kexec knob, or we have plan to try
> > > to move all of them. If there's some background information or
> > > discussion with a link, that would be helpful.
> > We're moving them all out. Sorry, yingelin's commit log message sucks
> > and it needs to be fixed to account for the justification. All the
> > filesystem sysctls are already moved out. Slowly we are moving the other
> > ones out and also doing minor optimizations along the way.

Thanks for the explanation. Yeah, not like code chaging for fixing or
improvement, providing justification is very helpful and imporant for
this kind of code moving.


> I'm sorry I didn't express it clearly. I'll fix it in v2 patch.

That's OK, look forward to seeing the v2.