linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.16 078/164] net: ll_temac: check the return value of devm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220228172407.085682912@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Feb 2022 18:24:00 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Xiaoke Wang <xkernel.wang@...mail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 078/164] net: ll_temac: check the return value of devm_kmalloc()

From: Xiaoke Wang <xkernel.wang@...mail.com>

commit b352c3465bb808ab700d03f5bac2f7a6f37c5350 upstream.

devm_kmalloc() returns a pointer to allocated memory on success, NULL
on failure. While lp->indirect_lock is allocated by devm_kmalloc()
without proper check. It is better to check the value of it to
prevent potential wrong memory access.

Fixes: f14f5c11f051 ("net: ll_temac: Support indirect_mutex share within TEMAC IP")
Signed-off-by: Xiaoke Wang <xkernel.wang@...mail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/ll_temac_main.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/ll_temac_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/ll_temac_main.c
@@ -1427,6 +1427,8 @@ static int temac_probe(struct platform_d
 		lp->indirect_lock = devm_kmalloc(&pdev->dev,
 						 sizeof(*lp->indirect_lock),
 						 GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!lp->indirect_lock)
+			return -ENOMEM;
 		spin_lock_init(lp->indirect_lock);
 	}