[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+1ixfw4+pwPcM5azPdC_4_bYCPu50jUvKnVMr6dSncpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 13:17:15 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@...k-chips.com>, Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: "heiko@...ech.de" <heiko@...ech.de>,
Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Liang Chen <cl@...k-chips.com>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, wulf <wulf@...k-chips.com>,
David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip: Add Naneng combo PHY bindings
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 3:15 AM Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@...k-chips.com> wrote:
>
> Add the compatible strings for the Naneng combo PHY found on rockchip SoC.
>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@...k-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v8: None
> Changes in v7:
> - remove u3otg0_port_en, u3otg1_port_en and pipe_sgmii_mac_sel
>
> Changes in v5:
> - modify description for ssc and ext-refclk
> - remove apb reset
>
> Changes in v4:
> - restyle
> - remove some minItems
> - add more properties
> - remove reset-names
> - move #phy-cells
> - add rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf
> - add rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf
>
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2:
> - Fix dtschema/dtc warnings/errors
>
> .../phy/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.yaml | 109 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.yaml
This now fails in linux-next:
/builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.example.dt.yaml:
syscon@...50000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be
fixed:
['rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf', 'syscon'] is too short
'rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf' is not one of ['rockchip,rk3288-sgrf',
'rockchip,rk3568-usb2phy-grf', 'rockchip,rv1108-usbgrf']
>From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.example.dt.yaml:
syscon@...70000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be
fixed:
['rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf', 'syscon'] is too short
'rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf' is not one of ['rockchip,rk3288-sgrf',
'rockchip,rk3568-usb2phy-grf', 'rockchip,rv1108-usbgrf']
>From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml
The problem appears to be that patch 1 was applied incorrectly and the
compatibles ended up in the wrong section (the one requiring
'simple-mfd'). Patch 1 probably conflicts as my bot will just skip the
patch if it conflicts which is why this had a different error report.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists