lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e3e4716-22e7-8684-394c-b5a457906975@oracle.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Feb 2022 15:45:13 -0500
From:   Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To:     Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jgross@...e.com,
        sstabellini@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com,
        joe.jin@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] xen: fix HVM kexec kernel panic



On 2/25/22 8:17 PM, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> Hi Boris,
> 
> On 2/25/22 2:39 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>
>> On 2/24/22 4:50 PM, Dongli Zhang wrote:
>>> This is the v3 of the patch to fix xen kexec kernel panic issue when the
>>> kexec is triggered on VCPU >= 32.
>>>
>>> PANIC: early exception 0x0e IP 10:ffffffffa96679b6 error 0 cr2 0x20
>>> [    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted
>>> 5.17.0-rc4xen-00054-gf71077a4d84b-dirty #1
>>> [    0.000000] Hardware name: Xen HVM domU, BIOS 4.4.4OVM 12/15/2020
>>> [    0.000000] RIP: 0010:pvclock_clocksource_read+0x6/0xb0
>>> ... ...
>>> [    0.000000] RSP: 0000:ffffffffaae03e10 EFLAGS: 00010082 ORIG_RAX:
>>> 0000000000000000
>>> [    0.000000] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000010000 RCX: 0000000000000002
>>> [    0.000000] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffffffffaac37515 RDI: 0000000000000020
>>> [    0.000000] RBP: 0000000000011000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
>>> [    0.000000] R10: ffffffffaae03df8 R11: ffffffffaae03c68 R12: 0000000040000004
>>> [    0.000000] R13: ffffffffaae03e50 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
>>> [    0.000000] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffffab588000(0000)
>>> knlGS:0000000000000000
>>> [    0.000000] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>> [    0.000000] CR2: 0000000000000020 CR3: 00000000ea410000 CR4: 00000000000406a0
>>> [    0.000000] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>>> [    0.000000] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>>> [    0.000000] Call Trace:
>>> [    0.000000]  <TASK>
>>> [    0.000000]  ? xen_clocksource_read+0x24/0x40
>>
>>
>> This is done to set xen_sched_clock_offset which I think will not be used for a
>> while, until sched_clock is called (and the other two uses are for suspend/resume)
>>
>>
>> Can we simply defer 'xen_sched_clock_offset = xen_clocksource_read();' until
>> after all vcpu areas are properly set? Or are there other uses of
>> xen_clocksource_read() before ?
>>
> 
> I have tested that below patch will panic kdump kernel.
> 



Oh well, so much for that then. Yes, sched_clock() is at least called from printk path.


I guess we will have to go with v2 then, we don't want to start seeing time going back, even if only with older hypervisors. The only thing I might ask is that you roll the logic inside xen_hvm_init_time_ops(). Something like


xen_hvm_init_time_ops()
{
	/*
	 * Wait until per_cpu(xen_vcpu, 0) is initialized which may happen
	 * later (e.g. when kdump kernel runs on >=MAX_VIRT_CPUS vcpu)
	 */
	if (__this_cpu_read(xen_vcpu_nr(0)) == NULL)
		return;

	...

-boris

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ