linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 5/7] ACPI: enumeration: Drop ugly ifdeffery from the examples

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220228223936.54310-5-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue,  1 Mar 2022 00:39:34 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 5/7] ACPI: enumeration: Drop ugly ifdeffery from the examples

The ifdeffery around ACPI ID tables are ugly and in some cases
even less valuable than plain definitions. Drop them for good
to avoid spreading rather bad pattern.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
 Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/enumeration.rst | 12 +++---------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/enumeration.rst b/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/enumeration.rst
index 96179d2a8871..93fdc04de9c3 100644
--- a/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/enumeration.rst
+++ b/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/enumeration.rst
@@ -47,18 +47,16 @@ some minor changes.
 Adding ACPI support for an existing driver should be pretty
 straightforward. Here is the simplest example::
 
-	#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 	static const struct acpi_device_id mydrv_acpi_match[] = {
 		/* ACPI IDs here */
 		{ }
 	};
 	MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, mydrv_acpi_match);
-	#endif
 
 	static struct platform_driver my_driver = {
 		...
 		.driver = {
-			.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(mydrv_acpi_match),
+			.acpi_match_table = mydrv_acpi_match,
 		},
 	};
 
@@ -212,18 +210,16 @@ The SPI device drivers only need to add ACPI IDs in a similar way than with
 the platform device drivers. Below is an example where we add ACPI support
 to at25 SPI eeprom driver (this is meant for the above ACPI snippet)::
 
-	#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 	static const struct acpi_device_id at25_acpi_match[] = {
 		{ "AT25", 0 },
 		{ },
 	};
 	MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, at25_acpi_match);
-	#endif
 
 	static struct spi_driver at25_driver = {
 		.driver = {
 			...
-			.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(at25_acpi_match),
+			.acpi_match_table = at25_acpi_match,
 		},
 	};
 
@@ -271,20 +267,18 @@ registered.
 Below is an example of how to add ACPI support to the existing mpu3050
 input driver::
 
-	#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 	static const struct acpi_device_id mpu3050_acpi_match[] = {
 		{ "MPU3050", 0 },
 		{ },
 	};
 	MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, mpu3050_acpi_match);
-	#endif
 
 	static struct i2c_driver mpu3050_i2c_driver = {
 		.driver	= {
 			.name	= "mpu3050",
 			.pm	= &mpu3050_pm,
 			.of_match_table = mpu3050_of_match,
-			.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(mpu3050_acpi_match),
+			.acpi_match_table = mpu3050_acpi_match,
 		},
 		.probe		= mpu3050_probe,
 		.remove		= mpu3050_remove,
-- 
2.34.1