linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: switch to devm_drm_of_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <164609067646.2361501.15747139249939190799@Monstersaurus>
Date:   Mon, 28 Feb 2022 23:24:36 +0000
From:   Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>
To:     José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>,
        andrzej.hajda@...el.com
Cc:     linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, jonas@...boo.se, airlied@...ux.ie,
        robert.foss@...aro.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        narmstrong@...libre.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jernej.skrabec@...il.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
        José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, maxime@...no.tech
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: switch to devm_drm_of_get_bridge

Hi José

Quoting José Expósito (2022-02-28 18:39:54)
> The function "drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge" has been deprecated in
> favor of "devm_drm_of_get_bridge".
> 
> Switch to the new function and reduce boilerplate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 8 +-------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index dab8f76618f3..fb8e16ed7e90 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -1232,15 +1232,9 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
>  {
>         struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(adev->dev.parent);
>         struct device_node *np = pdata->dev->of_node;
> -       struct drm_panel *panel;
>         int ret;
>  
> -       ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(np, 1, 0, &panel, NULL);
> -       if (ret)
> -               return dev_err_probe(&adev->dev, ret,
> -                                    "could not find any panel node\n");
> -
> -       pdata->next_bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(pdata->dev, panel);
> +       pdata->next_bridge = devm_drm_of_get_bridge(pdata->dev, np, 1, 0);

Yikes, I was about to rely on this panel variable to determine if the
device is a panel or a display port connector. (Well, I am relying on
it, and patches are hoping to be reposted this week).

Is there expected to be another way to identify if the next connection
is a panel or a bridge?

Regards

--
Kieran


>         if (IS_ERR(pdata->next_bridge)) {
>                 DRM_ERROR("failed to create panel bridge\n");
>                 return PTR_ERR(pdata->next_bridge);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>