[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YhyVL9SbeC2bd942@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:26:07 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, joao@...rdrivepizza.com, hjl.tools@...il.com,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
samitolvanen@...gle.com, mark.rutland@....com,
alyssa.milburn@...el.com, mbenes@...e.cz, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 34/39] objtool: Validate IBT assumptions
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 06:00:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 07:13:48PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > +static struct instruction *
> > > +validate_ibt_reloc(struct objtool_file *file, struct reloc *reloc)
> > > +{
> > > + struct instruction *dest;
> > > + struct section *sec;
> > > + unsigned long off;
> > > +
> > > + sec = reloc->sym->sec;
> > > + off = reloc->sym->offset + reloc->addend;
> >
> > This math assumes non-PC-relative. If it's R_X86_64_PC32 or
> > R_X86_64_PLT32 then it needs +4 added.
>
> Right; so I actually had that PC32 thing in there for a while, but ran
> into other trouble. I'll go try and figure it out.
Things like .rela.initcall*.init use PC32 but don't need the +4. If we
get that wrong it'll seal all the initcall and boot doesn't get very
far at all :-)
How do you feel about something like:
sec = reloc->sym->sec;
off = reloc->sym->offset;
if ((reloc->sec->base->sh.sh_flags & SHF_EXECINSTR) &&
(reloc->type == R_X86_64_PC32 || reloc->type == R_X86_64_PLT32))
off += arch_dest_reloc_offset(reloc->addend);
else
off += reloc->addend;
hmm ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists