[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0VkTROBxO7mLSsiquY9E6A-Jy4dG3a=SbtgVMHEO6knQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 12:53:15 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the arm-soc tree
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 9:45 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Commits
>
> 4fcfd917c9eb ("ARM: mstar: Add OPP table for infinity3")
> 9affaa4ad7cc ("ARM: mstar: Add OPP table for infinity")
> 79f700c24b13 ("ARM: mstar: Link cpupll to second core")
> 62a2718bf4c2 ("ARM: mstar: Link cpupll to cpu")
> 6979b5fedb92 ("ARM: mstar: Add cpupll to base dtsi")
> c952e5075de1 ("dt-bindings: clk: mstar msc313 cpupll binding description")
>
> are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.
Thank you for the report. These are now far down in the history of
my arm/dt branch, so I don't want to rebase that any more.
I see these patches all have Daniel as author and Signoff, with Romain
providing a Reviewed-by and doing the actual commit. As both
Romain and Daniel are maintainers for this platform, my guess is that
Romain ended up rebasing the tree without adding a signoff.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists