[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yhy/GvJegnTqYdq6@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 13:24:58 +0100
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Dhanraj, Vijay" <vijay.dhanraj@...el.com>
Cc: "Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Cathy" <cathy.zhang@...el.com>,
"Xing, Cedric" <cedric.xing@...el.com>,
"Huang, Haitao" <haitao.huang@...el.com>,
"Shanahan, Mark" <mark.shanahan@...el.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 16/32] x86/sgx: Support restricting of enclave page
permissions
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 07:21:50PM +0000, Dhanraj, Vijay wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Regarding the recent update of splitting the page permissions change
> request into two IOCTLS (RELAX and RESTRICT), can we combine them into
> one? That is, revert to how it was done in the v1 version?
They are logically separate complex functionalities:
1. "restrict" calls EMODPR and requires EACCEPT
2. "relax" increases permissions up to vetted ("EADD") and could be
combined with EMODPE called inside enclave.
I don't think it is a good idea.
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists