linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH linux-next] powercap/drivers/dtpm: dtpm_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jQcNUN-mQPu9+tsb=cfdrCaH16U77yMoAPZ2Si2gKX2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Mar 2022 18:58:22 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH linux-next] powercap/drivers/dtpm: dtpm_node_callback[]
 can be static

On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 4:29 AM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>
> drivers/powercap/dtpm.c:525:22: warning: symbol 'dtpm_node_callback' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Fixes: 3759ec678e89 ("powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add hierarchy creation")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/powercap/dtpm.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/powercap/dtpm.c b/drivers/powercap/dtpm.c
> index 414826a1509b6..6d890d8cf9169 100644
> --- a/drivers/powercap/dtpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/powercap/dtpm.c
> @@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ static struct dtpm *dtpm_setup_dt(const struct dtpm_node *hierarchy,
>
>  typedef struct dtpm * (*dtpm_node_callback_t)(const struct dtpm_node *, struct dtpm *);
>
> -dtpm_node_callback_t dtpm_node_callback[] = {
> +static dtpm_node_callback_t dtpm_node_callback[] = {
>         [DTPM_NODE_VIRTUAL] = dtpm_setup_virtual,
>         [DTPM_NODE_DT] = dtpm_setup_dt,
>  };

Applied, thanks!