[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yh5ivUp1dIFlih6L@iweiny-desk3>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 10:15:25 -0800
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 37/44] memremap_pages: Set PKS PKey in PTEs if
PGMAP_PROTECTIONS is requested
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:41:59AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 9:55 AM <ira.weiny@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> >
> > When the user requests protections the dev_pagemap mappings need to have
> > a PKEY set.
> >
> > Define devmap_protection_adjust_pgprot() to add the PKey to the page
> > protections. Call it when PGMAP_PROTECTIONS is requested when remapping
> > pages.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> > ---
>
> Does this patch have a reason to exist independent of the patch that
> introduced devmap_protection_enable()?
>
> Otherwise looks ok.
Just easier to review this specific change. For V8 I split the patches up
quite a bit to be much more direct to 1 change/patch. I think it worked out
well and I don't plan to merge much in V9 because as you say this change looks
good. :-D
Ira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists