[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29bad95d-06f8-ea7c-29fe-81e52823c90a@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 02:31:19 +0800
From: Hao Xu <haoxu@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Olivier Langlois <olivier@...llion01.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Cc: io-uring <io-uring@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] io_uring: Add support for napi_busy_poll
Hi Olivier,
On 3/1/22 21:47, Olivier Langlois wrote:
> The sqpoll thread can be used for performing the napi busy poll in a
> similar way that it does io polling for file systems supporting direct
> access bypassing the page cache.
>
> The other way that io_uring can be used for napi busy poll is by
> calling io_uring_enter() to get events.
>
> If the user specify a timeout value, it is distributed between polling
> and sleeping by using the systemwide setting
> /proc/sys/net/core/busy_poll.
>
> The changes have been tested with this program:
> https://github.com/lano1106/io_uring_udp_ping
>
> and the result is:
> Without sqpoll:
> NAPI busy loop disabled:
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.631/42.050/58.667/1.547 us
> NAPI busy loop enabled:
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.619/31.753/61.433/1.456 us
>
> With sqpoll:
> NAPI busy loop disabled:
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 42.087/44.438/59.508/1.533 us
> NAPI busy loop enabled:
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.779/37.347/52.201/0.924 us
>
> Co-developed-by: Hao Xu <haoxu@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <haoxu@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Langlois <olivier@...llion01.com>
> ---
> fs/io_uring.c | 230 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 229 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index f7b8df79a02b..37c065786e4b 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
> #include <net/sock.h>
> #include <net/af_unix.h>
> #include <net/scm.h>
> +#include <net/busy_poll.h>
> #include <linux/anon_inodes.h>
> #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> @@ -395,6 +396,11 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
> struct list_head sqd_list;
>
> unsigned long check_cq_overflow;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
> + /* used to track busy poll napi_id */
> + struct list_head napi_list;
> + spinlock_t napi_lock; /* napi_list lock */
> +#endif
>
> struct {
> unsigned cached_cq_tail;
> @@ -1464,6 +1470,10 @@ static __cold struct io_ring_ctx *io_ring_ctx_alloc(struct io_uring_params *p)
> INIT_WQ_LIST(&ctx->locked_free_list);
> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ctx->fallback_work, io_fallback_req_func);
> INIT_WQ_LIST(&ctx->submit_state.compl_reqs);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->napi_list);
> + spin_lock_init(&ctx->napi_lock);
> +#endif
> return ctx;
> err:
> kfree(ctx->dummy_ubuf);
> @@ -5399,6 +5409,108 @@ IO_NETOP_FN(send);
> IO_NETOP_FN(recv);
> #endif /* CONFIG_NET */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
> +
> +#define NAPI_TIMEOUT (60 * SEC_CONVERSION)
> +
> +struct napi_entry {
> + struct list_head list;
> + unsigned int napi_id;
> + unsigned long timeout;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Add busy poll NAPI ID from sk.
> + */
> +static void io_add_napi(struct file *file, struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + unsigned int napi_id;
> + struct socket *sock;
> + struct sock *sk;
> + struct napi_entry *ne;
> +
> + if (!net_busy_loop_on())
> + return;
> +
> + sock = sock_from_file(file);
> + if (!sock)
> + return;
> +
> + sk = sock->sk;
> + if (!sk)
> + return;
> +
> + napi_id = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_napi_id);
> +
> + /* Non-NAPI IDs can be rejected */
> + if (napi_id < MIN_NAPI_ID)
> + return;
> +
> + spin_lock(&ctx->napi_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(ne, &ctx->napi_list, list) {
> + if (ne->napi_id == napi_id) {
> + ne->timeout = jiffies + NAPI_TIMEOUT;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ne = kmalloc(sizeof(*ne), GFP_NOWAIT);
> + if (!ne)
> + goto out;
IMHO, we need to handle -ENOMEM here, I cut off the error handling when
I did the quick coding. Sorry for misleading.
> +
> + ne->napi_id = napi_id;
> + ne->timeout = jiffies + NAPI_TIMEOUT;
> + list_add_tail(&ne->list, &ctx->napi_list);
> +out:
> + spin_unlock(&ctx->napi_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void io_check_napi_entry_timeout(struct napi_entry *ne)
> +{
> + if (time_after(jiffies, ne->timeout)) {
> + list_del(&ne->list);
> + kfree(ne);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Busy poll if globally on and supporting sockets found
> + */
> +static bool io_napi_busy_loop(struct list_head *napi_list)
> +{
> + struct napi_entry *ne, *n;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(ne, n, napi_list, list) {
> + napi_busy_loop(ne->napi_id, NULL, NULL, true,
> + BUSY_POLL_BUDGET);
> + io_check_napi_entry_timeout(ne);
> + }
> + return !list_empty(napi_list);
> +}
> +
> +static void io_free_napi_list(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + spin_lock(&ctx->napi_lock);
> + while (!list_empty(&ctx->napi_list)) {
> + struct napi_entry *ne =
> + list_first_entry(&ctx->napi_list, struct napi_entry,
> + list);
> +
> + list_del(&ne->list);
> + kfree(ne);
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&ctx->napi_lock);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void io_add_napi(struct file *file, struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline void io_free_napi_list(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL */
> +
> struct io_poll_table {
> struct poll_table_struct pt;
> struct io_kiocb *req;
> @@ -5545,6 +5657,7 @@ static int io_poll_check_events(struct io_kiocb *req)
> if (unlikely(!filled))
> return -ECANCELED;
> io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
> + io_add_napi(req->file, ctx);
> } else if (req->result) {
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -5777,6 +5890,7 @@ static int __io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req,
> __io_poll_execute(req, mask);
> return 0;
> }
> + io_add_napi(req->file, req->ctx);
>
> /*
> * Release ownership. If someone tried to queue a tw while it was
> @@ -7519,7 +7633,11 @@ static int __io_sq_thread(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool cap_entries)
> !(ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED))
> ret = io_submit_sqes(ctx, to_submit);
> mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
> + if (!list_empty(&ctx->napi_list) &&
> + io_napi_busy_loop(&ctx->napi_list))
I'm afraid we may need lock for sqpoll too, since io_add_napi() could be
in iowq context.
I'll take a look at the lock stuff of this patch tomorrow, too late now
in my timezone.
> + ++ret;
> +#endif
> if (to_submit && wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->sqo_sq_wait))
> wake_up(&ctx->sqo_sq_wait);
> if (creds)
> @@ -7650,6 +7768,9 @@ struct io_wait_queue {
> struct io_ring_ctx *ctx;
> unsigned cq_tail;
> unsigned nr_timeouts;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
> + unsigned busy_poll_to;
> +#endif
> };
>
> static inline bool io_should_wake(struct io_wait_queue *iowq)
> @@ -7711,6 +7832,87 @@ static inline int io_cqring_wait_schedule(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
> return 1;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
> +static void io_adjust_busy_loop_timeout(struct timespec64 *ts,
> + struct io_wait_queue *iowq)
> +{
> + unsigned busy_poll_to = READ_ONCE(sysctl_net_busy_poll);
> + struct timespec64 pollto = ns_to_timespec64(1000 * (s64)busy_poll_to);
> +
> + if (timespec64_compare(ts, &pollto) > 0) {
> + *ts = timespec64_sub(*ts, pollto);
> + iowq->busy_poll_to = busy_poll_to;
> + } else {
> + u64 to = timespec64_to_ns(ts);
> +
> + do_div(to, 1000);
> + iowq->busy_poll_to = to;
> + ts->tv_sec = 0;
> + ts->tv_nsec = 0;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool io_busy_loop_timeout(unsigned long start_time,
> + unsigned long bp_usec)
> +{
> + if (bp_usec) {
> + unsigned long end_time = start_time + bp_usec;
> + unsigned long now = busy_loop_current_time();
> +
> + return time_after(now, end_time);
> + }
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool io_busy_loop_end(void *p, unsigned long start_time)
> +{
> + struct io_wait_queue *iowq = p;
> +
> + return signal_pending(current) ||
> + io_should_wake(iowq) ||
> + io_busy_loop_timeout(start_time, iowq->busy_poll_to);
> +}
> +
> +static void io_blocking_napi_busy_loop(struct list_head *napi_list,
> + struct io_wait_queue *iowq)
> +{
> + unsigned long start_time =
> + list_is_singular(napi_list) ? 0 :
> + busy_loop_current_time();
> +
> + do {
> + if (list_is_singular(napi_list)) {
> + struct napi_entry *ne =
> + list_first_entry(napi_list,
> + struct napi_entry, list);
> +
> + napi_busy_loop(ne->napi_id, io_busy_loop_end, iowq,
> + true, BUSY_POLL_BUDGET);
> + io_check_napi_entry_timeout(ne);
> + break;
> + }
> + } while (io_napi_busy_loop(napi_list) &&
> + !io_busy_loop_end(iowq, start_time));
> +}
> +
How about:
if (list is singular) {
do something;
return;
}
while (!io_busy_loop_end() && io_napi_busy_loop())
;
Btw, start_time seems not used in singular branch.
Regards,
Hao
> +static void io_putback_napi_list(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
> + struct list_head *napi_list)
> +{
> + struct napi_entry *cne, *lne;
> +
> + spin_lock(&ctx->napi_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(cne, &ctx->napi_list, list)
> + list_for_each_entry(lne, napi_list, list)
> + if (cne->napi_id == lne->napi_id) {
> + list_del(&lne->list);
> + kfree(lne);
> + break;
> + }
> + list_splice(napi_list, &ctx->napi_list);
> + spin_unlock(&ctx->napi_lock);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL */
> +
> /*
> * Wait until events become available, if we don't already have some. The
> * application must reap them itself, as they reside on the shared cq ring.
> @@ -7723,6 +7925,9 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events,
> struct io_rings *rings = ctx->rings;
> ktime_t timeout = KTIME_MAX;
> int ret;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
> + LIST_HEAD(local_napi_list);
> +#endif
>
> do {
> io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx);
> @@ -7745,13 +7950,29 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
> + iowq.busy_poll_to = 0;
> + if (!(ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL)) {
> + spin_lock(&ctx->napi_lock);
> + list_splice_init(&ctx->napi_list, &local_napi_list);
> + spin_unlock(&ctx->napi_lock);
> + }
> +#endif
> if (uts) {
> struct timespec64 ts;
>
> if (get_timespec64(&ts, uts))
> return -EFAULT;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
> + if (!list_empty(&local_napi_list))
> + io_adjust_busy_loop_timeout(&ts, &iowq);
> +#endif
> timeout = ktime_add_ns(timespec64_to_ktime(ts), ktime_get_ns());
> }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
> + else if (!list_empty(&local_napi_list))
> + iowq.busy_poll_to = READ_ONCE(sysctl_net_busy_poll);
> +#endif
>
> init_waitqueue_func_entry(&iowq.wq, io_wake_function);
> iowq.wq.private = current;
> @@ -7761,6 +7982,12 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events,
> iowq.cq_tail = READ_ONCE(ctx->rings->cq.head) + min_events;
>
> trace_io_uring_cqring_wait(ctx, min_events);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
> + if (iowq.busy_poll_to)
> + io_blocking_napi_busy_loop(&local_napi_list, &iowq);
> + if (!list_empty(&local_napi_list))
> + io_putback_napi_list(ctx, &local_napi_list);
> +#endif
> do {
> /* if we can't even flush overflow, don't wait for more */
> if (!io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx)) {
> @@ -9483,6 +9710,7 @@ static __cold void io_ring_ctx_free(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> io_req_caches_free(ctx);
> if (ctx->hash_map)
> io_wq_put_hash(ctx->hash_map);
> + io_free_napi_list(ctx);
> kfree(ctx->cancel_hash);
> kfree(ctx->dummy_ubuf);
> kfree(ctx);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists