linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/80] 5.10.103-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220301191404.GB607121@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 1 Mar 2022 11:14:04 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/80] 5.10.103-rc1 review

On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 06:23:41PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.103 release.  There
> are 80 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one.
> If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 02 Mar 2022 17:20:16 +0000.  Anything
> received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 161 pass: 161 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>

Guenter