linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] module: core code clean up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Mar 2022 07:07:30 +0000
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
CC:     "pmladek@...e.com" <pmladek@...e.com>,
        "cl@...ux.com" <cl@...ux.com>, "mbenes@...e.cz" <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "jeyu@...nel.org" <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
        "void@...ifault.com" <void@...ifault.com>,
        "atomlin@...mlin.com" <atomlin@...mlin.com>,
        "allen.lkml@...il.com" <allen.lkml@...il.com>,
        "joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
        "msuchanek@...e.de" <msuchanek@...e.de>,
        "oleksandr@...alenko.name" <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
        "jason.wessel@...driver.com" <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
        "daniel.thompson@...aro.org" <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] module: core code clean up

Hi Luis,

Le 01/03/2022 à 01:21, Luis Chamberlain a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:43:08PM +0000, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
>> Hi Luis,
>>
>> As per your suggestion [1], this is an attempt to refactor and split
>> optional code out of core module support code into separate components.
>> This version is based on Linus' commit 7993e65fdd0f ("Merge tag
>> 'mtd/fixes-for-5.17-rc5' of
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux").
>>
>> Petr,
>>
>> I decided to use preempt_disable() instead to remain consistent with the
>> rest of the file. Unfortunately, I did not make time to boot test etc.
> 
> Aaron, thanks so much for doing this!
> 
> Since no boot tests are performed yet, I just pushed this to modules-testing
> for now, after we get some boot test results I'll push to modules-next.
> 
> We should run kmod tests as well.
> 


My Kconfig patch and my two series still cleanly apply on v9. I don't 
need to rebase/resend them.


boot test is OK for me with Aaron's v9.


Christophe