lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220301182958.7897ce30@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 1 Mar 2022 18:29:58 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:     broonie@...nel.org,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with the block
 tree

Hi all,

On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 22:06:22 +0000 broonie@...nel.org wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   block/blk-lib.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   0a3140ea0fae3 ("block: pass a block_device and opf to blk_next_bio")
> 
> from the block tree and commit:
> 
>   2988062985d59 ("scsi: block: Remove REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME support")
> 
> from the scsi-mkp tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc block/blk-lib.c
> index fc6ea52e74824,bf5254ccdb5f8..0000000000000
> --- a/block/blk-lib.c
> +++ b/block/blk-lib.c
> 
> (took the deletion of _WRITE_SAME from scsi-mkp)

This is now a conflict between the scsi tree and the block tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ