[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40d9b2ad-2f8a-42c8-54cf-b22e24d78538@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 09:49:35 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@...il.com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.ibm.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] driver: platform: Add helper for safer setting
of driver_override
On 28/02/2022 21:03, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 02:52:04PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Several core drivers and buses expect that driver_override is a
>> dynamically allocated memory thus later they can kfree() it.
>
>> +int driver_set_override(struct device *dev, const char **override,
>> + const char *s, size_t len)
>> +{
>> + const char *new, *old;
>> + char *cp;
>> +
>> + if (!dev || !override || !s)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + /* We need to keep extra room for a newline */
>
> It would help a lot to extend this comment with a hint about where the
> room for a newline is needed. It was confusing even before, but it's
> much more so now that the check is in a completely different file than
> the "show" functions that need the space.
>
Indeed, this needs explanation.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists