linux-kernel - [PATCH -V14 3/3] memory tiering: skip to scan fast memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220301085329.3210428-4-ying.huang@intel.com>
Date:   Tue,  1 Mar 2022 16:53:29 +0800
From:   Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
        Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        zhongjiang-ali <zhongjiang-ali@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH -V14 3/3] memory tiering: skip to scan fast memory

If the NUMA balancing isn't used to optimize the page placement among
sockets but only among memory types, the hot pages in the fast memory
node couldn't be migrated (promoted) to anywhere.  So it's unnecessary
to scan the pages in the fast memory node via changing their PTE/PMD
mapping to be PROT_NONE.  So that the page faults could be avoided
too.

In the test, if only the memory tiering NUMA balancing mode is enabled, the
number of the NUMA balancing hint faults for the DRAM node is reduced to
almost 0 with the patch.  While the benchmark score doesn't change
visibly.

Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc: zhongjiang-ali <zhongjiang-ali@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
---
 mm/huge_memory.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
 mm/mprotect.c    | 13 ++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 406a3c28c026..9ce126cb0cfd 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 #include <linux/oom.h>
 #include <linux/numa.h>
 #include <linux/page_owner.h>
+#include <linux/sched/sysctl.h>
 
 #include <asm/tlb.h>
 #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
@@ -1766,17 +1767,28 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 	}
 #endif
 
-	/*
-	 * Avoid trapping faults against the zero page. The read-only
-	 * data is likely to be read-cached on the local CPU and
-	 * local/remote hits to the zero page are not interesting.
-	 */
-	if (prot_numa && is_huge_zero_pmd(*pmd))
-		goto unlock;
+	if (prot_numa) {
+		struct page *page;
+		/*
+		 * Avoid trapping faults against the zero page. The read-only
+		 * data is likely to be read-cached on the local CPU and
+		 * local/remote hits to the zero page are not interesting.
+		 */
+		if (is_huge_zero_pmd(*pmd))
+			goto unlock;
 
-	if (prot_numa && pmd_protnone(*pmd))
-		goto unlock;
+		if (pmd_protnone(*pmd))
+			goto unlock;
 
+		page = pmd_page(*pmd);
+		/*
+		 * Skip scanning top tier node if normal numa
+		 * balancing is disabled
+		 */
+		if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL) &&
+		    node_is_toptier(page_to_nid(page)))
+			goto unlock;
+	}
 	/*
 	 * In case prot_numa, we are under mmap_read_lock(mm). It's critical
 	 * to not clear pmd intermittently to avoid race with MADV_DONTNEED
diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
index 0138dfcdb1d8..2fe03e695c81 100644
--- a/mm/mprotect.c
+++ b/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/mm_inline.h>
 #include <linux/pgtable.h>
+#include <linux/sched/sysctl.h>
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
 #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
@@ -83,6 +84,7 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 			 */
 			if (prot_numa) {
 				struct page *page;
+				int nid;
 
 				/* Avoid TLB flush if possible */
 				if (pte_protnone(oldpte))
@@ -109,7 +111,16 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 				 * Don't mess with PTEs if page is already on the node
 				 * a single-threaded process is running on.
 				 */
-				if (target_node == page_to_nid(page))
+				nid = page_to_nid(page);
+				if (target_node == nid)
+					continue;
+
+				/*
+				 * Skip scanning top tier node if normal numa
+				 * balancing is disabled
+				 */
+				if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL) &&
+				    node_is_toptier(nid))
 					continue;
 			}
 
-- 
2.30.2