lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 1 Mar 2022 11:11:57 +0100 (CET)
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     wuchi.zero@...il.com
Cc:     Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
        jack@...e.cz, tj@...nel.org, mszeredi@...hat.com,
        sedat.dilek@...il.com, axboe@...com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Different writeback timing since v5.14

Hi!

Rafał and I discovered that page writeback on UBIFS behaves different since v5.14.
When a simple write, such as "echo foo > /mnt/ubibfs/bar.txt", happens it takes
a few seconds until writeback calls ubifs_writepage().

Before commit ab19939a6a50 ("mm/page-writeback: Fix performance when BDI's share of ratio is 0.")
it was 30 seconds (vm.dirty_expire_centisecs), after this change it happens after 5 seconds
(vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs).

Is this expected?
Just want to make sure that the said commit didn't uncover an UBIFS issue.

Thanks,
//richard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ