linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Initialize ret to 0 in scrub_simple

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1ebaefbc-ef9e-3060-3572-5ee560b7c4de@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Mar 2022 09:55:06 +0800
From:   Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@...el.com>
To:     Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
CC:     Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, <dsterba@...e.com>,
        <nathan@...nel.org>, "Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Initialize ret to 0 in scrub_simple_mirror()

Hi Souptick,

On 2/25/2022 18:02, Yujie Liu wrote:
> Hi Souptick,
> 
> On 2/25/2022 13:16, Souptick Joarder wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 3:18 PM Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@...el.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Souptick, could you help to provide the original report by link or attachment?
>>
>> https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=164487037605771&w=2
>>
> 
> this link is a notification mail of build status, but not a formal report,
> so there may be many false alerts in this mail, please ignore them.
> 

Sorry, previous info was not accurate, here are some updates:

In a build notification mail(such as above link https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=164487037605771&w=2),
there is a hint line like:

   possible Error/Warning in current branch (please contact us if interested):

the errors/warnings in this section are not fully verified like the ones generated
by static analysis tools.

We will make this line clearer to mention that they could be false positives.

Thanks,
Yujie