[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220301140544.GF6468@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 10:05:44 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
Cc: peterhuewe@....de, jarkko@...nel.org, stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, David.Laight@...LAB.COM,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
p.rosenberger@...bus.com,
Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] tpm: fix reference counting for struct tpm_chip
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 03:21:08AM +0100, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> @@ -653,8 +623,10 @@ void tpm_chip_unregister(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_TPM) && !tpm_is_firmware_upgrade(chip))
> hwrng_unregister(&chip->hwrng);
> tpm_bios_log_teardown(chip);
> - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 && !tpm_is_firmware_upgrade(chip))
> + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 && !tpm_is_firmware_upgrade(chip)) {
> cdev_device_del(&chip->cdevs, &chip->devs);
> + put_device(&chip->devs);
> + }
I would put those two lines in a function bside tpm_devs_add() as
well, more modular.
It looks like a good idea to me
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists