lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJoG2+--e6BqpwBYO0w4d_aUwmCmJVch=mvfq7idW__PRxsv6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Feb 2022 17:59:17 -0800
From:   Yusuf Khan <yusisamerican@...il.com>
To:     "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>
Cc:     "Xu, Yilun" <yilun.xu@...el.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mdf@...nel.org" <mdf@...nel.org>,
        "trix@...hat.com" <trix@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] pga: dfl: pci: Make sure DMA related error check is
 not done twice

Will do, but I do not know exactly what to remove  from the commit message,
I understand what to do for the title

Yusuf

On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:58 AM Wu, Hao <hao.wu@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 08:39:48PM -0800, Yusuf Khan wrote:
> > > Note: This bug was introduced here:
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-
> > next.git/patch/?id=ada3caabaf6135150077c3f729bb06e8f3b5b8f6
> > > I saw this commit inside the linux-next branch, it is not present in
> > > the mainline branch.
> > > The linux-next branch was last updated 5 days ago, so I am unsure
> > > about the state of that commit.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 8:27 PM Yusuf Khan <yusisamerican@...il.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In the case that the DMA 64 bit bit mask error check does not fail,
> > > > the error check will be done twice, this patch fixed that.
> > > >
> > > > NOTE: This patch is only for use in the linux-next branch as the
> > > > commit that caused this bug happened there.
>
> Thanks for the patch.
> please remove this from the commit message, and fix the title
> s/pga/fpga/
>
> Thanks
> Hao
>
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yusuf Khan <yusisamerican@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c | 9 +++++----
> > > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > > > index 717ac9715970..6222f18aed4b 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > > > @@ -356,11 +356,12 @@ int cci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const
> > struct pci_device_id *pcidevid)
> > > >         pci_set_master(pcidev);
> > > >
> > > >         ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pcidev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> > > > -       if (ret)
> > > > -               ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pcidev->dev,
> > DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> > > >         if (ret) {
> > > > -               dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "No suitable DMA support available.\n");
> > > > -               goto disable_error_report_exit;
> > > > +               ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pcidev->dev,
> > DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> > > > +               if (ret) {
> > > > +                       dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "No suitable DMA support
> > available.\n");
> > > > +                       goto disable_error_report_exit;
> > > > +               }
> >
> > Looks good to me.
> >
> > Acked-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
> >
> > > >         }
> > > >
> > > >         ret = cci_init_drvdata(pcidev);
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1
> > > >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ