[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a160RneN60cA2apHVt1D6oiV2KprG=uJ2mJwVvrR3z4pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 15:44:59 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...a.pv.it>,
Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>, Hu Haowen <src.res@...il.cn>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc-tw-discuss@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] Kbuild: move to -std=gnu11
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 11:43 AM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:32 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > -under ``-std=gnu89`` [gcc-c-dialect-options]_: the GNU dialect of ISO C90
> > -(including some C99 features). ``clang`` [clang]_ is also supported, see
> > +under ``-std=gnu11`` [gcc-c-dialect-options]_: the GNU dialect of ISO C11
> > +(including some C17 features). ``clang`` [clang]_ is also supported, see
>
> I think the "(including some C17)" bit would not make much sense
> anymore. There were no major changes in C17 and GCC implements
> `-std=c11` and `-std=c17` as basically the same thing according to the
> docs (and GNU extensions apply equally to both, I would assume).
Ok, changed now.
> When I wrote the "(including some C99 features)" I meant that GCC
> implemented some C99 features as extensions in C90 mode, and the
> kernel used some of those (e.g. the now gone VLAs).
I suppose it's still true for some c2x features (static_assert, fallthrough,
binary literals, ...), but it seems easier to just leave it out.
> With that changed, for `programming-language.rst`:
>
> Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists