[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yh42ZZFFcXnXqS5K@ninjato>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 16:06:13 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Michael Below <below@...iz.de>,
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] i2c: core: Use generic_handle_irq_safe() in
i2c_handle_smbus_host_notify().
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 11:26:46PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2022-02-23 14:21:32 [+0100], Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Is this 5.17 material? Or is 5.18 fine, too?
>
> 5.18 is fine. I intend to push into the RT-stable trees and this can't
> be backported without 1/7 and it does not affect !RT so I wouldn't
> bother.
Ok, applied to for-next then. Thanks for the heads up!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists