[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65c85c5e-f1ec-c5fe-7477-e28ce2528fd4@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 17:18:03 +0100
From: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: peterhuewe@....de, jarkko@...nel.org, stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, David.Laight@...LAB.COM,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
p.rosenberger@...bus.com,
Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] tpm: fix reference counting for struct tpm_chip
On 01.03.22 at 15:05, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 03:21:08AM +0100, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
>> @@ -653,8 +623,10 @@ void tpm_chip_unregister(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_TPM) && !tpm_is_firmware_upgrade(chip))
>> hwrng_unregister(&chip->hwrng);
>> tpm_bios_log_teardown(chip);
>> - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 && !tpm_is_firmware_upgrade(chip))
>> + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 && !tpm_is_firmware_upgrade(chip)) {
>> cdev_device_del(&chip->cdevs, &chip->devs);
>> + put_device(&chip->devs);
>> + }
>
> I would put those two lines in a function bside tpm_devs_add() as
> well, more modular.
>
Agreed, I will put this in a tpm_devs_remove() function as counterpart to tpm_devs_add().
Regards,
Lino
Powered by blists - more mailing lists