[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALMp9eT1N_HeipXjpyqrXs_WmBEip2vchy4d1GffpwrEd+444w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 09:52:47 -0800
From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Clear reserved bit PERF_CTL2[43]
for AMD erratum 1292
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 3:14 AM Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
>
> The AMD Family 19h Models 00h-0Fh Processors may experience sampling
> inaccuracies that cause the following performance counters to overcount
> retire-based events. To count the non-FP affected PMC events correctly,
> a patched guest with a target vCPU model would:
>
> - Use Core::X86::Msr::PERF_CTL2 to count the events, and
> - Program Core::X86::Msr::PERF_CTL2[43] to 1b, and
> - Program Core::X86::Msr::PERF_CTL2[20] to 0b.
>
> To support this use of AMD guests, KVM should not reserve bit 43
> only for counter #2. Treatment of other cases remains unchanged.
>
> AMD hardware team clarified that the conditions under which the
> overcounting can happen, is quite rare. This change may make those
> PMU driver developers who have read errata #1292 less disappointed.
>
> Reported-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
This seems unnecessarily convoluted. As I've said previously, KVM
should not ever synthesize a #GP for any value written to a
PerfEvtSeln MSR when emulating an AMD CPU.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists