linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] samples/kobject: Use sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Mar 2022 02:11:36 +0800
From:   Phi Nguyen <phind.uet@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] samples/kobject: Use sysfs_emit instead of
 snprintf

On 3/2/2022 10:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 08:07:59PM +0800, Nguyen Dinh Phi wrote:
>> Convert sprintf() to sysfs_emit() in order to check buffer overrun on sysfs
>> outputs.
> 
> There are no such buffer overruns on these sysfs files.
>
I don't want to duplicate the title so I use the description of 
sysfs_emit() as the patch message. I have just realized that the title 
is also incorrect, sorry for my mistake.

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@...il.com>
>> ---
>>   samples/kobject/kobject-example.c | 4 ++--
>>   samples/kobject/kset-example.c    | 4 ++--
>>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> Why is this a resend?  What happened to the first version?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

There is no response for the first version. Actually, there is no 
Maintainer is associated with these two files (in MAINTAINERS files), 
hence, my first patch was only sent to the linux-kernel mailing list.

BR,
Phi.