linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux-next] mm: swap: get rid of deadloop in swapin readahead

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Mar 2022 11:31:38 -0800 (PST)
From:   Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:     Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, cgel.zte@...il.com,
        naoya.horiguchi@....com, mhocko@...nel.org, minchan@...nel.org,
        hannes@...xchg.org, rogerq@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, guo.ziliang@....com.cn,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>,
        Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@....com.cn>,
        Jiang Xuexin <jiang.xuexin@....com.cn>,
        Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] mm: swap: get rid of deadloop in swapin
 readahead

On Tue, 1 Mar 2022, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> Using msleep() seems pretty pointless so I plan to go ahead with patch
> as-is, with a cc:stable.  None of it is pretty, but it's better than
> what we have now, yes?

Yes, I've no objection to that.

Hugh