linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 13/14] module: Move kdb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220302203153.3kcmwu662szf3drt@ava.usersys.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Mar 2022 20:31:53 +0000
From:   Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
To:     Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc:     mcgrof@...nel.org, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, pmladek@...e.com,
        cl@...ux.com, mbenes@...e.cz, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        jeyu@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, void@...ifault.com,
        atomlin@...mlin.com, allen.lkml@...il.com, joe@...ches.com,
        msuchanek@...e.de, oleksandr@...alenko.name,
        jason.wessel@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 13/14] module: Move kdb_modules list out of core code

On Wed 2022-03-02 16:19 +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:43:21PM +0000, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> > No functional change.
> > 
> > This patch migrates kdb_modules list to core kdb code
> > since the list of added/or loaded modules is no longer
> > private.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
> > Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c    | 5 +++++
> >  kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_private.h | 4 ----
> >  kernel/module/main.c           | 4 ----
> >  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c
> > index 0852a537dad4..5369bf45c5d4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c
> > +++ b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c
> > @@ -59,6 +59,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kdb_grepping_flag);
> >  int kdb_grep_leading;
> >  int kdb_grep_trailing;
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> > +extern struct list_head modules;
> > +static struct list_head *kdb_modules = &modules; /* kdb needs the list of modules */

Hi Daniel,

> If modules is no longer static then why do we kdb_modules at all?
> kdb_modules is used exactly once and it can now simply be replaced
> with &modules.

In my opinion, I would prefer to avoid an explicit include of "internal.h"
in kernel/module. By definition it should be reserved for internal use to
kernel/module only. Please keep to the above logic.

Christophe, Luis,

Thoughts?


Kind regards,

-- 
Aaron Tomlin